Cited by 107Public Relations and Crisis CommunicationDisaster Management and ResilienceKnowledge Management and Sharing

Harnessing the Power of Self-Organization in an Online Community During Organizational Crisis1

Nan, Ning, Lu, Yong·2014·MIS Quarterly

Abstract

Organizational crisis management has traditionally favored a centralized plan-and-control approach. This study explores the possibility for an orderly crisis management process to arise unintentionally from decen-tralized and spontaneous actions in an online community (i.e., self-organization). Based on complex adaptive systems theory, a multilevel model is developed to account for the logical relation between individual-level actions and interactions in an online community and an organizational-level orderly and rational crisis management process, as described by the organizational crisis management literature. We apply this multilevel model to an analysis of 89,596 posts from an online community that was deeply embedded in an earthquake-induced organizational crisis. Results indicate that fluctuation of message content themes in this online community served to energize continuous input from ordinary organization members. These input actualized new possibilities offered by the technology platform for crisis management actions (i.e., actualized IT affordances). Concatenation of immediate impacts of message content themes and actualized IT affordances formed feedback loops that moderated the crisis management activities toward an efficient trajectory. Our findings challenge the traditional assumption that macro-level order requires micro-level order-seeking behaviors. They suggest the viability of self-organization as a new source of organizational order that complements the traditional centralized plan-and-control approach. Theoretical and empirical implications for harnessing the power of ordinary organization members connected by today’s technology platforms are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.25300/misq/2014/38.4.09

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 107

Authors
Nan, N., & Lu, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2014-12-01
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
1135-1158
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
OpenAlex
W1485108229
Cited by
107
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
Keywords
self-organization, corporate crisis management, online communities, complex adaptive systems, IT affordances, feedback loops, multilevel models, social networking sites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review