Harnessing the Power of Self-Organization in an Online Community During Organizational Crisis1
Abstract
Organizational crisis management has traditionally favored a centralized plan-and-control approach. This study explores the possibility for an orderly crisis management process to arise unintentionally from decen-tralized and spontaneous actions in an online community (i.e., self-organization). Based on complex adaptive systems theory, a multilevel model is developed to account for the logical relation between individual-level actions and interactions in an online community and an organizational-level orderly and rational crisis management process, as described by the organizational crisis management literature. We apply this multilevel model to an analysis of 89,596 posts from an online community that was deeply embedded in an earthquake-induced organizational crisis. Results indicate that fluctuation of message content themes in this online community served to energize continuous input from ordinary organization members. These input actualized new possibilities offered by the technology platform for crisis management actions (i.e., actualized IT affordances). Concatenation of immediate impacts of message content themes and actualized IT affordances formed feedback loops that moderated the crisis management activities toward an efficient trajectory. Our findings challenge the traditional assumption that macro-level order requires micro-level order-seeking behaviors. They suggest the viability of self-organization as a new source of organizational order that complements the traditional centralized plan-and-control approach. Theoretical and empirical implications for harnessing the power of ordinary organization members connected by today’s technology platforms are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Online communities can be used to develop networks of support for responding to emergencies.
“Founded by passionate and enthusiastic individuals, OCs can be used to develop networks of support as a way for responding to emergencies (e.g.Nan & Lu, 2014);”
From Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action (2022) · cites this paper as Nan & Lu, 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 72 · Cited by 107
- Authors
- Nan, N., & Lu, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 2014-12-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1135-1158
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W1485108229
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Keywords
- self-organization, corporate crisis management, online communities, complex adaptive systems, IT affordances, feedback loops, multilevel models, social networking sites
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review