Work and the Nature of Man.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hygiene factors such as pay and working conditions prevent dissatisfaction.
“Herzberg distinguishes between hygiene factors and motivators, arguing that factors such as pay and working conditions prevent dissatisfaction”
From Rewards and Employee Performance in Government Agencies: Evidence from Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA), Uganda (2026) · cites this paper as Dunnette & Herzberg, 1967
Motivators such as recognition, achievement, and advancement promote satisfaction and performance.
“while recognition, achievement, and advancement promote satisfaction and performance (Dunnette & Herzberg, 1967).”
From Rewards and Employee Performance in Government Agencies: Evidence from Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA), Uganda (2026) · cites this paper as Dunnette & Herzberg, 1967
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 3,170
- Authors
- Dunnette, M. D., & Herzberg, F.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1967-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 170
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009926593
- Cited by
- 3,170
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 110 · 2016: 130 · 2015: 154 · 2014: 201 · 2013: 170 · 2012: 161
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Administrative Science Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Demography › Education and Work Dynamics
- Keywords
- work, human nature, personality and work
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
