The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Empirical Taxonomy of Structures of Work Organizations
Abstract
The taxonomy of structures of work organizations presented is based on three previously established empirical dimensions: structuring of activities, concentration of authority, and line control of workflow. On the basis of a sample of 52 organizations in the English Midlands, clusters of organizations on these three dimensions are examined and a sevenfold classification of organization structures is developed. These are identified as full bureaucracy, nascent full bureaucracy, work flow bureaucracy, nascent workflow bureaucracy, preworkflow bureaucracy, personnel bureaucracy, and implicitly structured organizations, their characteristic contextual features as to size, technology, dependence on other organizations, and ownership are demonstrated, and a possible developmental sequence is suggested. The results indicate that the concept of a single bureaucratic type is no longer useful, since bureaucracy takes different forms in different settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms
Miller, D. (1983) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770 · Cited by 5,853
Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice
Child, J. (1972) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/003803857200600101 · Cited by 4,790
CONFIGURATIONAL APPROACHES TO ORGANIZATIONAL ANALYSIS.
MEYER, A. D., TSUI, A. S., & HININGS, C. R. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256809 · Cited by 2,053
Self-citationEqual Opportunity Law and the Construction of Internal Labor Markets
Dobbin, F., Sutton, J. R., Meyer, J. W., & Scott, R. (1993) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/230269 · Cited by 613
A Chemistry of Organization: Combinatory Analysis and Design
Grandori, A., & Furnari, S. (2008) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607088023 · Cited by 246
Toward a Core Typology of Service Organizations
Mills, P. K., & Margulies, N. (1980) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1980.4288746 · Cited by 271
Collaboration Structure, Communication Media, and Problems in Scientific Work Teams
Walsh, J. P., & Maloney, N. G. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00346.x · Cited by 114
When does virtuality help or hinder teams? Core team characteristics as contingency factors
Schaubroeck, J. M., & Yu, A. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.009 · Cited by 55
Bernacchio, C., & Foss, N. (2024) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4736313 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., & Hinings, C. R.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1969-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020124650
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.