The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Examination of Adams' Theory of Inequity
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines the empirical evidence for Adams' theory of inequity. Studies testing propositions concerning the effects of inequity on performance and on allocation of rewards, and concerning the determinants and the psychological state of inequity are analyzed. There seems to be initial support for the theory. Some methodological and theoretical issues relevant for further validating the theory are reviewed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Reciprocity and credit building in a laboratory dyad.
Pruitt, D. G. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025323 · Cited by 139
Cited by
A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories
Greenberg, J. (1987) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257990 · Cited by 2,284
Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT)
Michalos, A. C. (1985) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf00333288 · Cited by 913
Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity.
Deci, E. L. (1972) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0032355 · Cited by 888
Toward an integrative framework of organizational control
Flamholtz, E. G., Das, T. K., & Tsui, A. S. (1985) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(85)90030-3 · Cited by 675
Multiple Discrepancies Theory (MDT)
Michalos, A. C. (2005) · Social Indicators Research Series · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3742-2_13 · Cited by 593
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodman, P. S., & Friedman, A.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1971-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 271
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001514524
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
