Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 362

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Successor Type and Organizational Change in the Corporate Enterprise

Helmich, Donald L., Brown, Warren B.·1972·Administrative Science Quarterly

Abstract

This research examines the hypothesis that corporate organizations experiencing inside succession in the office of the president exhibit less organizational change than firms undergoing outside succession. The type of succession is related to a combined measure of organizational change based on position shifts and personnel turnover in the executive role constellation. The research also controls for background effects from five potentially confounding variables: organizational performance, successor's style of leadership, intensity of operations, organizational size, and administrative growth in the industry. Measurable events of the succession process of the organization are emphasized, rather than the direct observation of social organizational patterns that emerge in the executive group itself. The data base is derived from 208 chemical and allied product corporations which have experienced presidential succession at least once in the ten-year period of analysis. The analysis of the data using the partial gamma coefficient and a modification of the chi-square statistic supports the basic hypothesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2392150

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Helmich, D. L., & Brown, W. B.
Venue
Administrative Science Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1972-09
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
371
ISSN
0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087815556
Cited by
362
References
0
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.