Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,370

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements.

Open access
Pearce, Jone L., Rousseau, Denise M.·1998·Administrative Science Quarterly

Abstract

Introduction Contracting A Modern Dilemma Contract Making The Contract Makers Contemporary Contracts Violating the Contract Changing the Contract Business Strategy and Contracts Trends in the New Social Contract

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2393595

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,370

Metadata

Authors
Pearce, J. L., & Rousseau, D. M.
Venue
Administrative Science Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1998-03
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
184
ISSN
0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082504580
Cited by
2,370
References
0
FWCI
102.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2393595
The paper
Pearce, J. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1998). Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393595

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.