The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Jumping Ship: The Diffusion of Strategy Abandonment
Abstract
This paper is part of my doctoral dissertation at Stanford University. I am grateful for the advice of James G. March, William P. Barnett, and Joel Podolny, the comments of Michael T. Hannan, Pamela Haunschild, Christine Oliver, David Strang, Nancy Brandon Tuma, and anonymous reviewers for ASQ, and the editorial assistance of Linda Pike. Financial support from the Stanford Center of Organizations Research, the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, the Richard D. Irwin Foundation, and the Spencer Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. This paper focuses on organizations' abandonment of strategy, which may be driven jointly by contagion qnd competition from other organizations. This paper treats both explanations but emphasizes contagion. I argue that strategy abandonment is contagious because the future performance of current and alternative strategies is highly uncertain, causing decision makers to examine the actions of other organizations in the industry for clues to the correct action. Contagion from organizations easily observed by the focal organization is stronger than contagion from other organizations, causing corporate links across markets to become important routes for the contagion of strategy abandonment. This theory is tested on a sample of radio stations abandoning a strategy and is supported by evidence that contagion of abandonment occurs through the influence of an organization's social reference groups.'
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes
Wood, J. V. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.231 · Cited by 1,957
Cited by
Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s
Davis, G. F., & Greve, H. R. (1997) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/231170 · Cited by 1,237
Self-citationRemembrance of Things Past? The Dynamics of Organizational Forgetting
Holan, P. M. D., & Phillips, N. (2004) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0273 · Cited by 556
McAdam, D., & Scott, W. R. (2005) · Social Movements and Organization Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791000.003 · Cited by 516
Management challenges in a new time
Barkema, H. G., Baum, J. A. C., & Mannix, E. A. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069322 · Cited by 307
Sebhatu, A., Wennberg, K., Arora-Jonsson, S., & Lindberg, S. I. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2010625117 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Greve, H. R.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 444
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085975509
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Jumping Ship: The Diffusion of Strategy Abandonment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2393793
- The paper
- Greve, H. R. (1995). Jumping Ship: The Diffusion of Strategy Abandonment. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393793
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.