Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 743

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using the Plural Form in the Management of Restaurant Chains

Bradach, Jeffrey L.·1997·Administrative Science Quarterly

Abstract

The paper profited greatly from the careful reading and helpful comments given by Nitin Nohria, Herminia Ibarra, Steve Barley, and the three ASO reviewers. The author is grateful to Robert Eccles, Paul Lawrence, Peter Marsden, and Pat Kaufmann for their early help in framing the issues, to the companies that served as research sites, and to the Division of Research at Harvard Business School for its financial support. This article uses data from a field study of five large U.S. restaurant chains to model how chains use a plural form-simultaneous use of company and franchise units-to maintain uniformity and achieve systemwide adaptation to changing markets. From interview and observational data, I identify organizational structure, control systems, career paths, and strategy-making processes as four means through which the combination of company and franchise units helps chains achieve their objectives. The paper shows how the control and innovation processes provided by this plural form ameliorate some of the weaknesses and leverage some of the strengths of the company and franchise arrangements, enhancing the performance of the chain overall.'

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2393921

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 743

Metadata

Authors
Bradach, J. L.
Venue
Administrative Science Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1997-06
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
276
ISSN
0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003451690
Cited by
743
References
5
FWCI
36.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.