The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Erratum: The Use of Metal Tolerant Plant Populations for the Reclamation of Metalliferous Wastes
Abstract
SUMMARY (1) A survey was made of metalliferous mine wastes in Great Britain. The results suggest that high concentrations of toxic metals are the major cause of sparse vegetation cover, but comparisons of bare and adjacent vegetated areas suggests that phosphorus concentrations are the immediate determinant. (2) Field experiments, using a range of grass species at a large number of mine sites, showed that naturally occurring tolerant populations grew faster and persisted longer than normal commercial varieties. They provide an excellent stabilizing cover, provided adequate fertilizer was given, and have persisted for 9 years with little loss of vigour, even with minimal fertilizer treatment. (3) The most successful populations at each site were those with the highest tolerance to the metals occurring in that waste, provided that the species was appropriately adapted to the other soil conditions occurring there. (4) Three cultivars are now commercially available which are tolerant to: acid lead/zinc wastes (Agrostis tennis, cv. Goginan), calcareous lead/zinc wastes (Festuca rubra, cv Merlin) and copper wastes (Agrostis tennis, cv Parys). These enable stabilization of a wide variety of wastes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Restoration of mined lands - using natural processes
Bradshaw, A. (1997) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0925-8574(97)00022-0 · Cited by 713
Self-citationStoltz, E., & Greger, M. (2002) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/s0098-8472(02)00002-3 · Cited by 499
Phytoremediation of mine tailings in temperate and arid environments
Mendez, M. O., & Maier, R. M. (2008) · Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology · doi:10.1007/s11157-007-9125-4 · Cited by 435
Cooke, J. A., & Johnson, M. S. (2002) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a01-014 · Cited by 367
Whiting, S. N., Reeves, R. D., Richards, D., Johnson, M. S., Cooke, J. A., Malaisse, F., Paton, A., Smith, J. A. C., Angle, J. S., Chaney, R. L., et al. (2004) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1061-2971.2004.00367.x · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, R. A. H., & Bradshaw, A. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1981-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 678
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995088947
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Erratum: The Use of Metal Tolerant Plant Populations for the Reclamation of Metalliferous Wastes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2402432
- The paper
- Smith, R. A. H., & Bradshaw, A. D. (1981). Erratum: The Use of Metal Tolerant Plant Populations for the Reclamation of Metalliferous Wastes. The Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2402432
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.