Cited by 355Heavy metals in environmentBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesGeology and Environmental Impact Studies

Research priorities for conservation of metallophyte biodiversity and their potential for restoration and site remediation

Open access
Whiting, S. N., Reeves, R. D., Richards, D., Johnson, M. S., Cooke, J. A., Malaisse, F., Paton, A., Smith, J. A. C. +11 more·2004·Restoration Ecology

Abstract

Abstract Plants that have evolved to survive on metal‐rich soils—metallophytes—have key values that must drive research of their unique properties and ultimately their conservation. The ability of metallophytes to tolerate extreme metal concentrations commends them for revegetation of mines and metal‐contaminated sites. Metallophytes can also be exploited in environmental technologies, for example, phytostabilization, phytoremediation, and phytomining. Actions towards conserving metallophyte species are imperative, as metallophytes are increasingly under threat of extinction from mining activity. Although many hundreds of papers describe both the biology and applications of metallophytes, few have investigated the urgent need to conserve these unique species. This paper identifies the current state of metallophyte research, and advocates future research needs for the conservation of metallophyte biodiversity and the sustainable uses of metallophyte species in restoration, rehabilitation, contaminated site remediation, and other nascent phytotechnologies. Six fundamental questions are addressed: (1) Is enough known about the global status of metallophytes to ensure their conservation? (2) Are metallophytes threatened by the activities of the minerals industry, and can their potential for the restoration or rehabilitation of mined and disturbed land be realized? (3) What problems exist in gaining prior informed consent to access metallophyte genetic resources and how can the benefits arising from their uses be equitably shared? (4) What potential do metallophytes offer as a resource base for phytotechnologies? (5) Can genetic modification be used to “design” metallophytes to use in the remediation of contaminated land? (6) Does the prospect of using metallophytes in site remediation and restoration raise ethical issues?

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1061-2971.2004.00367.x

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Angiosperms predominantly accumulate Ni, as evident in reports of 140 species grown on the islands of New Caledonia and Cuba.

    “Angiosperms predominantly accumulate Ni, as evident in the reports of 140 species grown on the islands of New Caledonia and Cuba (Whiting et al., 2004; Jaffré et al., 2013).”

    From Plant hyperaccumulators: a state-of-the-art review on mechanism of heavy metal transport and sequestration (2025) · cites this paper as Whiting et al., 2004

    In “The Need for Field Explorations Using an Ecological Approach” (page unavailable), the paper lists about 330 Ni-hyperaccumulating species, more than for any other metal listed. Its “Focus on Metallophyte Hotspots” section discusses New Caledonia and Cuba, but our copy does not report 140 Ni-accumulating species on those islands or establish the claim specifically for angiosperms. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 1526100x, 2004, 1, · DOI
  2. Batianoff, G. N., R. L. Specht, and R. D. Reeves. 1991. The serpentinite flora of the humid subtropics of eastern Australia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland 101:137157.
  3. Bradshaw, A. D. 1997. Restoration after mining for metals-an ecological view. Pages 239248. in T. Jaffre ´, R. D. Reeves, and T. Becquer, editors. The ecology of ultramafic and metalliferous areas. Orstom, Noumea, New Caledonia.
  4. Brooks, R. R., R. D. Reeves, and A. J. M. Baker. 1992. The serpentine vegetation of Goia ´s State, Brazil. Pages 6781 in J. Proctor, A. J. M. Baker, and R. D. Reeves, editors. The vegetation of ultra- mafic (serpentine) soils. Intercept Ltd, Andover, United Kingdom.
  5. Cobbett, C., and P. Goldsbrough. 2002. Phytochelatins and metallothio- neins: roles in heavy metal detoxification and homeostasis. Annual Review of Plant Biology 53:159182.
  6. Daniels, W. L., T. Stuczynski, R. L. Chaney, K. Pantuck, and F. Pistelok. 1998. Reclamation of Pb/Zn smelter wastes in Upper Silesia, Poland. Pages 269276 in H. R. Fox, H. M. Moore, and A. D. McIntosh, editors. Land reclamation: achieving sustainable benefits. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  7. Morrey, D. R., K. Balkwill, M. J. Balkwill, and S. Williamson. 1992. A review of some studies of the serpentine flora of southern Africa. Pages 147157 in A. J. M. Baker, J. Proctor, and R. D. Reeves, editors. The vegetation of ultramafic (serpentine) soils. Intercept Ltd, Andover, United Kingdom.
  8. Reeves, R. D. 1992. Hyperaccumulation of nickel by serpentine plants. Pages 253277 in A. J. M. Baker, J. Proctor, and R. D. Reeves, editors. The vegetation of ultramafic (serpentine) soils. Intercept Ltd, Andover, United Kingdom.
  9. Reeves, R. D., and A. J. M. Baker. 2000. Metal accumulating plants. Pages 193229 in I. Raskin and B. Ensley, editors. Phytoremediation of toxic metals: using plants to clean up the environment. Wiley and Sons, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whiting, S. N., Reeves, R. D., Richards, D., Johnson, M. S., Cooke, J. A., Malaisse, F., Paton, A., Smith, J. A. C., Angle, J. S., Chaney, R. L., Ginocchio, R., Jaffré, T., Johns, R., McIntyre, T., Purvis, O. W., Salt, D. E., Schat, H., Zhao, F. J., & Baker, A. J. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Massey University (NZ)
  • Rio Tinto (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
  • Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (BE)
  • Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (NC)
  • Natural History Museum (GB)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Rothamsted Research (GB)
Corresponding author
Baker, A. J. M.
Venue
Restoration Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02-23
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
106-116
ISSN
  • 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-100X
OpenAlex
W2088244679
Cited by
355
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
10.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Restoration Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Geology and Environmental Impact Studies
Keywords
metallophytes, metal-tolerant plants, plant conservation, biodiversity conservation, mine revegetation, contaminated site remediation, phytoremediation, phytostabilization, phytomining, genetic resources, prior informed consent, benefit sharing, genetic modification, ethics of biotechnology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review