Cited by 39Aeolian processes and effectsSeedling growth and survival studiesTurfgrass Adaptation and Management

Establishment of Ammophila arenaria (Marram Grass) from Culms, Seeds and Rhizomes

Putten, W. H. Van Der·1990·The Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

(1) A study was made of three different methods of establishing Ammophila arenaria: planting bundles of culms (the traditional method), sowing seeds, and disc-harrowing rhizomes. The effects of applying slow-release fertilizer were also examined. (2) A preliminary experiment examined the relative effects of straw, carboxy methyl cellulose, compost, reed, and a mixture of crop species in stabilising the sand. Only straw was effective. (3) Sowing seeds at 200, 400, and 600 m-2 and rhizomes (fragments 15 cm long, each with at least two buds) at 20, 40, and 60 pieces m-2, showed that higher rates resulted in higher numbers of seedlings and primary shoots. However, after one growing season, production of biomass and tillers was only increased by fertilization. (4) Although the recovery in above-ground plant parts of N and P was fairly low, slowrelease NPK fertilizer (80-20-20 kg ha-1) increased biomass significantly. Fertilizing rhizomes with 160-40-40 kg NPK haproduced significantly more dry matter than with 80-20-20 kg NPK ha1, but this had no effect on sown or planted A. arenaria. (5) Rhizomes produced more tillers and biomass than bundles of culms and seedlings when fertilizer was applied. Without fertilizer, culms gave most biomass production, but seedling growth was very poor. (6) A germination experiment in the laboratory showed that a high rate and percentage of germination was obtained at fluctuating temperatures and by supplying light. At fluctuating low temperatures, stratification increased germination of seeds. At fluctuating high temperatures, seeds germinated well and stratification gave no improvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2403577

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Putten, W. H. V. D.
Corresponding author
Putten, W. H. Van Der
Venue
The Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1990-04
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
188
ISSN
0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059827948
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Aeolian processes and effects
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Seedling growth and survival studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
Keywords
Ammophila arenaria, marram grass, sowing, slow-release fertilizer, NPK fertilization, seed germination, seed stratification, fluctuating temperature, sand stabilization, straw, carboxymethyl cellulose, compost, reed, biomass production, tillering, coastal dune restoration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review