The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical Properties of Ratios. I. Empirical Results
Abstract
Atchley, W. R., C. T. Gaskins, and D. Anderson (Departments of Biological Sciences, Animal Sciences, and Biomedical Engineering and Computer Medicine, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409) 1976. Statistical properties of ratios. I. Empirical results. Syst. Zool. 25:137–148.—Results are presented of an empirical analysis on the statistical consequences of compounding ratios of continuous variables. Three commonly employed relationships among the ratio variables Y and Z were examined including 1) Y = X1/X2, Z = X3/X2; 2) Y = X1/X2, Z = X1; and 3) Y = X1/X2, Z = X2. Simulation studies with minimum sample sizes of 25,000 indicated large and systematic changes in both the structure and the underlying distributions of data when ratios and proportions were compounded between continuous variables. Ratio variables are skewed to the right and leptokurtic and the nonnormality is increased when magnitude of the denominator coefficient of variation is increased. Further, there is a pronounced increase in spurious correlation between variables when ratios are compounded and the magnitude of this spurious correlation is a function of the size of the denominator coefficient of variation. This spurious correlation may increase from r = 0.0 between the original raw variables to r = 0.99 between the derived ratio variables. Multivariate statistical procedures such as principal components analysis are greatly affected when the data upon which the analyses are based include ratios or proportions. In this case, there is often an inflation of the first eigenvalue together with large changes in the magnitude and direction of the coefficients on the various principal components. Several common applications of ratios in biological research are discussed. Contrary to a widely held belief, it is shown that in the scaling of data, ratios do not remove the effect of the scaling variables but rather increase the correlation between the ratio variable and the original scaling variable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Logical basis for morphological characters in phylogenetics
Sereno, P. C. (2007) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00161.x · Cited by 620
Dynamics of soil nitrogen and carbon accumulation for 61 years after agricultural abandonment
Knops, J. M. H., & Tilman, D. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0088:dosnac]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 595
Packard, G. C., & Boardman, T. J. (1999) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology · doi:10.1016/s1095-6433(98)10170-8 · Cited by 439
Saccani, E. (2015) · Geoscience Frontiers · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2014.03.006 · Cited by 434
Analysis of covariance: an alternative to nutritional indices
Raubenheimer, D., & Simpson, S. L. (1992) · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1992.tb00662.x · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Atchley, W. R., Gaskins, C. T., & Anderson, D.
- Venue
- Systematic Zoology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1976-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137
- ISSN
- 0039-7989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030605500
- Cited by
- 615
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Properties of Ratios. I. Empirical Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2412740
- The paper
- Atchley, W. R., Gaskins, C. T., & Anderson, D. (1976). Statistical Properties of Ratios. I. Empirical Results. Systematic Zoology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412740
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.