The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Isoenzymatic Variation in Zea (Gramineae)
Abstract
An average of 14(7-34) plants each for 61 different collections of Zea (maize and its wild relatives, the teosintes) were studied for 12 enzyme systems coded for by 21 loci. Principal component and cluster analyses based on allele frequencies showed Zea can be divided into two major groups: 1) sect. Luxuriantes, including Z. perennis, Z. diploperennis, and Z. luxurians; and 2) sect. Zea (in part), including Z. mays subsp. mays, var. parviglumis, and subsp. mexicana. Zea mays var. huehuetenangensis (Huehuetenango teosinte) is isoenzymatically distinct from both sections, but shows its closest relationship to Z. mays var. parviglumis of sect. Zea. Populations of Z. mays subsp. mexicana and var. parviglumis grade isoenzymatically from one into the other without any clear break, but without any overlap either. Five populations of Z. mays subsp. mays are all isoenzymat- ically very similar to Z. mays var. parviglumis. The isozyme data are consistent with the theory that Mexican annual teosinte is the ancestor of maize. With the exception of the unusual isoenzymatic nature of Z. mays var. huehuetenangensis, the isoenzymatic data agree with previous studies of tassel morphology and cytoplasm DNAs. A comparison of sympatric populations of maize and teosinte suggests that teosintes are not greatly affected by introgression from maize. Zea mays var. parviglumis and Z. diploperennis have considerable within and among population variation; Z. luxurians has much less. Race Central Plateau of Z. mays subsp. mexicana has greater among population variation than any other taxon in Zea. Zea tends to show greater within population heterozygosity and more variance within species and subspecies than most other plants that have been studied isoenzymat- ically.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The limits of selection during maize domestication
Wang, R.-L., Stec, A., Hey, J., Lukens, L., & Doebley, J. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/18435 · Cited by 740
Self-citationGenetics and morphological evolution in plants
Gottlieb, L. D. (1984) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284231 · Cited by 361
Meiotic drive of chromosomal knobs reshaped the maize genome
Buckler, E. S., Phelps-Durr, T. L., Buckler, C. S. K., Dawe, R. K., Doebley, J. F., & Holtsford, T. P. (1999) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/153.1.415 · Cited by 193
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Doebley, J. F., Goodman, M. M., & Stuber, C. W.
- Venue
- Systematic Botany
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1984-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203
- ISSN
- 0363-6445 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2312708895
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- hr
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isoenzymatic Variation in Zea (Gramineae). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2418824
- The paper
- Doebley, J. F., Goodman, M. M., & Stuber, C. W. (1984). Isoenzymatic Variation in Zea (Gramineae). Systematic Botany. https://doi.org/10.2307/2418824
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.