Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Isoenzymatic Variation in Zea (Gramineae)

Doebley, John F., Goodman, Major M., Stuber, Charles W.·1984·Systematic Botany

Abstract

An average of 14(7-34) plants each for 61 different collections of Zea (maize and its wild relatives, the teosintes) were studied for 12 enzyme systems coded for by 21 loci. Principal component and cluster analyses based on allele frequencies showed Zea can be divided into two major groups: 1) sect. Luxuriantes, including Z. perennis, Z. diploperennis, and Z. luxurians; and 2) sect. Zea (in part), including Z. mays subsp. mays, var. parviglumis, and subsp. mexicana. Zea mays var. huehuetenangensis (Huehuetenango teosinte) is isoenzymatically distinct from both sections, but shows its closest relationship to Z. mays var. parviglumis of sect. Zea. Populations of Z. mays subsp. mexicana and var. parviglumis grade isoenzymatically from one into the other without any clear break, but without any overlap either. Five populations of Z. mays subsp. mays are all isoenzymat- ically very similar to Z. mays var. parviglumis. The isozyme data are consistent with the theory that Mexican annual teosinte is the ancestor of maize. With the exception of the unusual isoenzymatic nature of Z. mays var. huehuetenangensis, the isoenzymatic data agree with previous studies of tassel morphology and cytoplasm DNAs. A comparison of sympatric populations of maize and teosinte suggests that teosintes are not greatly affected by introgression from maize. Zea mays var. parviglumis and Z. diploperennis have considerable within and among population variation; Z. luxurians has much less. Race Central Plateau of Z. mays subsp. mexicana has greater among population variation than any other taxon in Zea. Zea tends to show greater within population heterozygosity and more variance within species and subspecies than most other plants that have been studied isoenzymat- ically.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2418824

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Doebley, J. F., Goodman, M. M., & Stuber, C. W.
Venue
Systematic Botany
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1984-04
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
203
ISSN
0363-6445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2312708895
Cited by
211
References
0
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
hr
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isoenzymatic Variation in Zea (Gramineae). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2418824
The paper
Doebley, J. F., Goodman, M. M., & Stuber, C. W. (1984). Isoenzymatic Variation in Zea (Gramineae). Systematic Botany. https://doi.org/10.2307/2418824

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.