Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Strategy of Body Size in Mammalian Carnivores

Rosenzweig, Michael L.·1968·American Midland Naturalist

Abstract

Techniques of statistical analysis are utilized to begin to unravel the causes involved in the evolution of body size clines in mammalian carnivores. Variables included are productivity, temperature, latitude, competitive pressure and size of potential prey. Temperature and latitude are shown to be good predictors of body size in several species. Indeed, they seem to be measures of the same cause, as has long been maintained by those attempting to explain Bergmann's rule. But temperature does no better than latitude at predicting size. Thus temperature is probably not a direct cause of Bergmann's rule in these animals. The measure of total primary productivity used (actual annual evapotranspiration, AE) proved to be one of the better corre- lates, especially at lower productivities. Apparently relatively meager food supplies set upper limits to, body size. Except in a very few cases, the biotic variables of competitive pressure and prey size were only second-rate predictors. Discussion of the patterns that have been shown by this analysis is included.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2423529

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Rosenzweig, M. L.
Venue
American Midland Naturalist
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1968-10
Volume
80
Issue
2
Pages
299
ISSN
0003-0031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2323456901
Cited by
357
References
1
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.