Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Response of Fishes to Periodic Spring Floods in a Southeastern Stream

Ross, Stephen T., Baker, John A.·1983·American Midland Naturalist

Abstract

Movement of fishes onto a fringing floodplain was studied by seining and trapping during five spring floods. We collected 26 species from the inundated floodplain; the known channel fauna is 42 species. Species numerically dominant on the floodplain were Fundulus olivaceus, F. notti, Gambusia affinis, Notropis welaka, N. texanus, N. roseipinnis, Lepomis macrochirus, L. cyanellus and L. marginatus. Catch-per-effort in traps was generally greatest on the upper floodplain during the day and greatest nearer the channel at night. Night activity of fishes on the floodplain was apparently low. Several species, which we term flood-quiescent forms, were common in the channel (e.g., Lepomis megalotis and Percina nigrofasciata) but did not exploit the floodplain. Activity (as catch per trap-hour) of P. nigrofasciata was negatively correlated with floodinduced turbidity. A flood-exploitative species, Notropis texanus, had higher population abundance during 3 high-flow years than in 3 low-flow years, suggesting that spring flooding may exert significant control over fish community structure. INTRODUCTION Periodic flooding is characteristic of most lotic systems. Based on channel morphology and gradient, floods may be erosive and thus potentially destructive to the stream habitat, or depositional, exhibiting creeping and being generally nondestructive to channel morphology (Welcomme, 1979). Most studies of the effects of flooding on aquatic organisms have treated erosive floods (e.g., Paloumpis, 1958; John, 1963, 1964; Greenfield et al., 1970; Seegrist and Gard, 1972; Hanson and Waters, 1974; Hoopes, 1975; Harrell, 1978), in which severe faunal disruption often occurs. Adaptations of organisms to erosive floods are either for surviving high flow rates through behavioral or morphological modifications, or for life history characteristics allowing rapid recolonization. Few studies have addressed the effects of nondestructive flooding on North American streams. Such floods occur in low gradient systems in which floods are primarily characterized by lateral expansion rather than increases in depth (Welcomme, 1979). While lateral expansion of rivers onto floodplains is best developed in tropical areas (Welcomme, 1979), many North American streams, especially in the southeastern United States, also show (or showed prior to levee construction and channelization) well-developed fringing floodplains (Viosca, 1927; Gunter, 1957; Bennett, 1958; Guillory, 1979). Such natural floodplains may be seasonally inundated. Forbes (1925) pointed out the importance of inundated floodplains as breeding grounds and foraging areas for fishes and aquatic invertebrates. Wickliff (1945) recorded movement of fishes onto an inundated floodplain. Starrett (1951) determined that certain minnows spawn in backwater areas and suggested that flooding was an important factor controlling minnow populations. Bennett (1958) believed that periodic flooding of the Mississippi and Illinois rivers was beneficial to largemouth bass populations. Guillory (1979) found that a number of Mississippi River species used inundated floodplains as

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2425509

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Ross, S. T., & Baker, J. A.
Venue
American Midland Naturalist
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1983-01
Volume
109
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
0003-0031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2331801017
Cited by
165
References
0
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Response of Fishes to Periodic Spring Floods in a Southeastern Stream. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2425509
The paper
Ross, S. T., & Baker, J. A. (1983). The Response of Fishes to Periodic Spring Floods in a Southeastern Stream. American Midland Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.2307/2425509

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.