The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interspecific variation in plant responses to mycorrhizal colonization in tallgrass prairie
Abstract
Symbiotic associations between plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are ubiquitous and ecologically important in many grasslands. Differences in species responses to mycorrhizal colonization can have a significant influence on plant community structure. The growth responses of 36 species of warm‐ and cool‐season tallgrass prairie grasses and 59 tallgrass prairie forbs to arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal colonization were assessed in greenhouse studies to examine the extent of interspecific variation in host‐plant benefit from the symbiosis and patterns of mycorrhizal dependence among host plant life history (e.g., annual, perennial) and taxonomic (e.g., grass, forb, legume, nonlegume) groups and phenological guilds. There was a strong and significant relationship between phenology of prairie grasses and mycorrhizal responsiveness, however this relationship was less apparent in forbs. Perennial warm‐season C 4 grasses and forbs generally benefited significantly from the mycorrhizal symbiosis, whereas biomass production of the cool‐season C 3 grasses was not affected. The root systems of the cool‐season grasses were also less highly colonized by the AM fungi, as compared to the warm‐season grasses or forbs. Unlike the native perennials, annuals were generally not responsive to mycorrhizal colonization and were lower in percentage root colonization than the perennial species. Plant growth responsiveness and AM root colonization were positively correlated for the nonleguminous species, with this relationship being strongest for the cool‐season grasses. In contrast, root colonization of prairie legumes showed a significant, but negative, relationship to mycorrhizal growth responsiveness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: a review
Evelin, H., Kapoor, R., & Giri, B. (2009) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcp251 · Cited by 1,083
Effects of grazing on grassland soil carbon: a global review
McSherry, M. E., & Ritchie, M. E. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12144 · Cited by 829
Hamilton, E. W., & Frank, D. A. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2397:cpssma]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 687
Vukicevich, E., Lowery, T., Bowen, P., Úrbez-Torres, J. R., & Hart, M. (2016) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-016-0385-7 · Cited by 406
Gollotte, A., van Tuinen, D., & Atkinson, D. (2004) · Mycorrhiza · doi:10.1007/s00572-003-0244-7 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, G. W. T., & Hartnett, D. C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1732-1738
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2054987373
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interspecific variation in plant responses to mycorrhizal colonization in tallgrass prairie. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2446507
- The paper
- Wilson, G. W. T., & Hartnett, D. C. (1998). Interspecific variation in plant responses to mycorrhizal colonization in tallgrass prairie. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.