The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Usefulness of Earnings and Earnings Research: Lessons and Directions from Two Decades of Empirical Research
Abstract
Baruch Lev, On the Usefulness of Earnings and Earnings Research: Lessons and Directions from Two Decades of Empirical Research, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 27, Current Studies on The Information Content of Accounting Earnings (1989), pp. 153-192
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality
Aaker, D. A., & Jacobson, R. (1994) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152193 · Cited by 789
The information content of annual earnings announcements and mandatory adoption of IFRS
Landsman, W. R., Maydew, E. L., & Thornock, J. R. (2012) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.04.002 · Cited by 681
Qualitative Research: Experiences in Using Semi-Structured Interviews
Horton, J., Macve, R., & Struyven, G. (2004) · The Real Life Guide to Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/b978-008043972-3/50022-0 · Cited by 334
Enache, L., & Hussainey, K. (2020) · Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting · doi:10.1007/s11156-019-00794-8 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Lev, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Accounting Research
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- 153
- ISSN
- 0021-8456 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046942780
- Cited by
- 1,120
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
