Qualitative Research: Experiences in Using Semi-Structured Interviews
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Semi-structured interviews can provide an in-depth understanding of the research topic, revealing issues not previously identified.
“Furthermore, semi-structured interviews can provide 209 an in-depth understanding of the research topic, for example revealing issues not previously 210 identified (Horton et al., 2004).”
From Design strategies to increase the reuse of wood materials in buildings: Lessons from architectural practice (2022) · cites this paper as Horton et al., 2004
Cites
Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards.
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/tar-4500569 · Cited by 2,667 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Piccardo, C., & Hughes, M. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133083 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
- Authors
- Horton, J., Macve, R., & Struyven, G.
- Venue
- The Real Life Guide to Accounting Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2004
- Pages
- 339-357
- OpenAlex
- W2503228337
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 9.07
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- semi-structured interviews, qualitative research methodology, interview design, questionnaire development, interviewee selection, cross-cultural research, researcher experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
