Coping With Systems Risk: Security Planning Models for Management Decision Making1
Abstract
The likelihood that the firm’s information systems are insufficiently protected against certain kinds of damage or loss is known as “systems risk.” Risk can be managed or reduced when managers are aware of the full range of controls available and implement the most effective controls. Unfortunately, they often lack this knowledge, and their subsequent actions to cope with systems risk are less effective than they might otherwise be. This is one viable explanation for why losses from computer abuse and computer disasters today are uncomfortably large and still so potentially devastating after many years of attempting to deal with the problem. Results of comparative qualitative studies in two information services Fortune 500 firms identify an approach that can effectively deal with the problem. This theory-based security program includes (1) use of a security risk planning model, (2) education/training in security awareness, and (3) Countermeasure Matrix analysis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Straub and Welke's research on information security deterrence supports this framing: perceived certainty of sanctions combined with perceived difficulty of undetected action significantly influences the decision calculus of potential offenders.
“Straub and Welke's research on information security deterrence supports this framing: perceived certainty of sanctions combined with perceived difficulty of undetected action significantly influences the decision calculus of potential offenders [48].”
From Geopolitical competition, online radicalisation, and organisational culture as vectors of the evolving insider threat (2026) · cites this paper as [48]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Avoidance of Information Technology Threats: A Theoretical Perspective1
Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650279 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA)
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.001 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
Product-Related Deception in E-Commerce: A Theoretical Perspective1
Xiao, B., & Benbasat, I. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23043494 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Homoliak, I., Toffalini, F., Guarnizo, J., Elovici, Y., & Ochoa, M. (2020) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3303771 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
SUN, L., SRIVASTAVA, R. P., & MOCK, T. J. (2006) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222220405 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
HIPAA security compliance challenges: The case for small healthcare providers
Chen, J. Q., & Benusa, A. (2017) · International Journal of Healthcare Management · doi:10.1080/20479700.2016.1270875 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Wood, P. (2026) · Discover Global Society · doi:10.1007/s44282-026-00510-7
- Authors
- Straub, D. W., & Welke, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Georgia State University (US)
- ORCID
- Straub, Detmar W.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 1998-12-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 441-469
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W2119587968
- Cited by
- 1,120
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 77
- FWCI
- 26.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
- Keywords
- information systems security, risk management, management decision-making, security countermeasures, security awareness training, computer abuse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review