The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Production and Transaction Economies and IS Outsourcing: A Study of the U. S. Banking Industry1
Abstract
This paper studies economic determinants of IS outsourcing. It argues that a focus on comparative economic theories and models can improve our ability to explain outsourcing within the larger context of organizational strategy and environment. Specifically, the research constructs of production cost, transaction cost, and financial slack are examined simultaneously to understand what influences the outsourcing decision. To empirically test these relationships, information was gathered from senior IT managers in 243 U.S. banks. Financial indices from the archives of the Federal Reserve Bank were a second important source of data. Results of the study show that IS outsourcing in banks was strongly influenced by production cost advantages offered by vendors. Transaction costs played a role in the outsourcing decision, but they were much smaller than production costs. Finally, financial slack was not found to be a significant explanator, although firm size was a significant control factor. The paper has important implications for research and practice. For researchers, the findings provide evidence that financial criteria can be key factors in outsourcing decisions and compare the relative effects of production and transaction costs. For practitioners, the findings suggest that managerial sourcing strategies need to weigh both costs when hiring systems integrators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Cited by
Information systems outsourcing: a survey and analysis of the literature
Dibbern, J., Goles, T., Hirschheim, R., & Jayatilaka, B. (2004) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1035233.1035236 · Cited by 1,381
Levina, N., & Ross, J. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036537 · Cited by 699
A transaction cost model of IT outsourcing
Aubert, B. A., Rivard, S., & Patry, M. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.09.001 · Cited by 428
Ang, S., & Slaughter, S. A. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250920 · Cited by 296
Self-citationFrom outsourcing to Cloud computing: Evolution of IT services
Dhar, S. (2012) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/01409171211247677 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Ang, S., & Straub, D. W.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 1998-12-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 535-552
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W1498806680
- Cited by
- 684
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.