The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From the Vendor’s Perspective: Exploring the Value Proposition in Information Technology Outsourcing1, 2
Abstract
To date, most research on information technology (IT) outsourcing concludes that firms decide to outsource IT services because they believe that outside vendors possess production cost advantages. Yet it is not clear whether vendors can provide production cost advantages, particularly to large firms who may be able to replicate vendors’ production cost advantages in-house. Mixed outsourcing success in the past decade calls for a closer examination of the IT outsourcing vendor’s value proposition. While the client’s sourcing decisions and the client-vendor relationship have been examined in IT outsourcing literature, the vendor’s perspective has hardly been explored. In this paper, we conduct a close examination of vendor strategy and practices in one long-term successful applications management outsourcing engagement. Our analysis indicates that the vendor’s efficiency was based on the economic benefits derived from the ability to develop a complementary set of core competencies. This ability, in turn, was based on the centralization of decision rights from a variety and multitude of IT projects controlled by the vendor. The vendor was enticed to share the value with the client through formal and informal relationship management structures. We use the economic concept of complementarity in organizational design, along with prior findings from studies of client-vendor relationships, to explain the IT vendors’ value proposition. We further explain how vendors can offer benefits that cannot be readily replicated internally by client firms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,361
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,152
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,802
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
A resource‐based view of the firm
Wernerfelt, B. (1984) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250050207 · Cited by 25,635
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Applegate, 1991, Eastman Kodak Co.: Managing Information Systems Through Strategic Alliances
- Azoulay, P. “Acquiring Knowledge Across and Within Firm Boundaries: Evidence from Clinical Development,” in Three Essays on the Diffusion and Development of Pharmaceutical Innovations, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.
- Barua, 2000, Information Technology and Business Performance: Past, Present, and Future, 65
- Buxbaum, 2002, Bringing IT Back Home, Computerworld, 36, 38
- Caldwell, 1997, Outsourcing Backlash, Information Week
- Chabrow, 2002, The IBM-Amex Deal: A Radical Change In IT Outsourcing, InformationWeek
- Currie, 2000, The Supply-Side of IT Outsourcing: the Trend Towards Mergers, Acquisitions and Joint Ventures, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30, 238, 10.1108/09600030010325993 · doi:10.1108/09600030010325993
- Currie, 1998, Using Multiple Suppliers to Mitigate the Risks of IT Outsourcing in Two UK Companies: ICI and Wessex Water, Journal of Information Technology, 13, 169, 10.1177/026839629801300303 · doi:10.1177/026839629801300303
- Earl, 1996, Limits of IT Outsourcing, Sloan Management Review, 37, 26
- Edgeworth, 1881, Mathematical Physics
- Garner, 1998, R-E-S-P-E-C-T, Computerworld
- Goles, T. The Impact of Client-Vendor Relationship on Outsourcing Success, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 2001.
- Hardin, 2002, Trust and Trustworthiness
- Henderson, 1990, Strategic Alignment: A Model for Organizational Transformation via Information Technology
- Ichniowski, 1997, The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity, American Economic Review, 87, 291
- Lacity, 1995, IT Outsourcing: Maximize Flexibility and Control, Harvard Business Review, 73, 84
- Low, 2002, Invisible Advantage: From Innovation to Reputation—How Intangibles Are Driving Business Performance
- Mason, 2000, Report Shows ‘Two Nations’ of it Spend Health Services Lag Behind General Growth, Computer Weekly, 19
- McMurtrey, 2002, Job Satisfaction of Information Technology Workers: The Impact of Career Orientation and Task Automation in a CASE Environment, Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 273, 10.1080/07421222.2002.11045719 · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045719
- Richmond, 1993, Software Development Outsourcing Contract: Structure and Business Value, Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 57, 10.1080/07421222.1993.11517990 · doi:10.1080/07421222.1993.11517990
- Samuelson, 1974, Complementarity, Journal of Economic Literature, 12, 1255
- Scheier, 1997, Businesses Outsourcing More, But Less Thrilled with Results, Computerworld
- Useem, 2000, Leading Laterally in Company Outsourcing, Sloan Management Review, 41, 25
- Willcocks, 2000, Relationships in IT Outsourcing: A Stakholder Perspective, 355
Cited by
Information systems outsourcing: a survey and analysis of the literature
Dibbern, J., Goles, T., Hirschheim, R., & Jayatilaka, B. (2004) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1035233.1035236 · Cited by 1,381
Chandler, J. D., & Lusch, R. F. (2015) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670514537709 · Cited by 549
A Glorious and Not-So-Short History of the Information Systems Field
Louisiana State University, Hirschheim, R., Klein, H., & State University of New York (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00294 · Cited by 282
Search engine marketing is not all gold: Insights from Twitter and SEOClerks
Aswani, R., Kar, A. K., Ilavarasan, P. V., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.07.005 · Cited by 262
Seidel, S., & Urquhart, C. (2013) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2013.17 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Levina, N., & Ross, J. W.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-364
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W1548771125
- Cited by
- 699
- References
- 87
- FWCI
- 45.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From the Vendor’s Perspective: Exploring the Value Proposition in Information Technology Outsourcing1, 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/30036537
- The paper
- Levina, N., & Ross, J. W. (2003). From the Vendor’s Perspective: Exploring the Value Proposition in Information Technology Outsourcing1, 2. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036537
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.