Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 699

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From the Vendor’s Perspective: Exploring the Value Proposition in Information Technology Outsourcing1, 2

Levina, Natalia, Ross, Jeanne W.·2003·MIS Quarterly

Abstract

To date, most research on information technology (IT) outsourcing concludes that firms decide to outsource IT services because they believe that outside vendors possess production cost advantages. Yet it is not clear whether vendors can provide production cost advantages, particularly to large firms who may be able to replicate vendors’ production cost advantages in-house. Mixed outsourcing success in the past decade calls for a closer examination of the IT outsourcing vendor’s value proposition. While the client’s sourcing decisions and the client-vendor relationship have been examined in IT outsourcing literature, the vendor’s perspective has hardly been explored. In this paper, we conduct a close examination of vendor strategy and practices in one long-term successful applications management outsourcing engagement. Our analysis indicates that the vendor’s efficiency was based on the economic benefits derived from the ability to develop a complementary set of core competencies. This ability, in turn, was based on the centralization of decision rights from a variety and multitude of IT projects controlled by the vendor. The vendor was enticed to share the value with the client through formal and informal relationship management structures. We use the economic concept of complementarity in organizational design, along with prior findings from studies of client-vendor relationships, to explain the IT vendors’ value proposition. We further explain how vendors can offer benefits that cannot be readily replicated internally by client firms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/30036537

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 87 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Applegate, 1991, Eastman Kodak Co.: Managing Information Systems Through Strategic Alliances
  2. Azoulay, P. “Acquiring Knowledge Across and Within Firm Boundaries: Evidence from Clinical Development,” in Three Essays on the Diffusion and Development of Pharmaceutical Innovations, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.
  3. Barua, 2000, Information Technology and Business Performance: Past, Present, and Future, 65
  4. Buxbaum, 2002, Bringing IT Back Home, Computerworld, 36, 38
  5. Caldwell, 1997, Outsourcing Backlash, Information Week
  6. Chabrow, 2002, The IBM-Amex Deal: A Radical Change In IT Outsourcing, InformationWeek
  7. Currie, 2000, The Supply-Side of IT Outsourcing: the Trend Towards Mergers, Acquisitions and Joint Ventures, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30, 238, 10.1108/09600030010325993 · doi:10.1108/09600030010325993
  8. Currie, 1998, Using Multiple Suppliers to Mitigate the Risks of IT Outsourcing in Two UK Companies: ICI and Wessex Water, Journal of Information Technology, 13, 169, 10.1177/026839629801300303 · doi:10.1177/026839629801300303
  9. Earl, 1996, Limits of IT Outsourcing, Sloan Management Review, 37, 26
  10. Edgeworth, 1881, Mathematical Physics
  11. Garner, 1998, R-E-S-P-E-C-T, Computerworld
  12. Goles, T. The Impact of Client-Vendor Relationship on Outsourcing Success, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 2001.
  13. Hardin, 2002, Trust and Trustworthiness
  14. Henderson, 1990, Strategic Alignment: A Model for Organizational Transformation via Information Technology
  15. Ichniowski, 1997, The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity, American Economic Review, 87, 291
  16. Lacity, 1995, IT Outsourcing: Maximize Flexibility and Control, Harvard Business Review, 73, 84
  17. Low, 2002, Invisible Advantage: From Innovation to Reputation—How Intangibles Are Driving Business Performance
  18. Mason, 2000, Report Shows ‘Two Nations’ of it Spend Health Services Lag Behind General Growth, Computer Weekly, 19
  19. McMurtrey, 2002, Job Satisfaction of Information Technology Workers: The Impact of Career Orientation and Task Automation in a CASE Environment, Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 273, 10.1080/07421222.2002.11045719 · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045719
  20. Richmond, 1993, Software Development Outsourcing Contract: Structure and Business Value, Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 57, 10.1080/07421222.1993.11517990 · doi:10.1080/07421222.1993.11517990
  21. Samuelson, 1974, Complementarity, Journal of Economic Literature, 12, 1255
  22. Scheier, 1997, Businesses Outsourcing More, But Less Thrilled with Results, Computerworld
  23. Useem, 2000, Leading Laterally in Company Outsourcing, Sloan Management Review, 41, 25
  24. Willcocks, 2000, Relationships in IT Outsourcing: A Stakholder Perspective, 355

Cited by

See all 699

Metadata

Authors
Levina, N., & Ross, J. W.
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2003-09-01
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
331-364
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
OpenAlex
W1548771125
Cited by
699
References
87
FWCI
45.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From the Vendor’s Perspective: Exploring the Value Proposition in Information Technology Outsourcing1, 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/30036537
The paper
Levina, N., & Ross, J. W. (2003). From the Vendor’s Perspective: Exploring the Value Proposition in Information Technology Outsourcing1, 2. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036537

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.