The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Software Evaluation and Choice: Predictive Validation of the Technology Acceptance Instrument
Abstract
Information technology (IT) researchers repeatedly insist upon the rigorous validation of measuring instruments, yet most IT instruments remain at an early stage of development.The Technology Acceptance Model indicate that perceived usefulness and ease of use will influence an individual's intentios to use an information technology. This research introduces a criterion variable that measures intentions as a choice among sevearl alternatives with subjects actually expecting to use their choice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Mathieson, K. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.173 · Cited by 4,216
Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249577 · Cited by 3,084
Validating Instruments in MIS Research1
Straub, D. W. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248922 · Cited by 2,526
On the Test-Retest Reliability of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Scales
Hendrickson, A. R., Massey, P. D., & Cronan, T. P. (1993) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249803 · Cited by 477
Issues in the use and interpretation of discriminant analysis.
Huberty, C. J. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.95.1.156 · Cited by 410
Methodological Issues in Experimental IS Research: Experiences and Recommendations
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Dickson, G. W., & DeSanctis, G. (1985) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249115 · Cited by 236
Teng, J. T. C., & Galletta, D. F. (1991) · ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/109022.109024 · Cited by 55
Cited by
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice
Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.00407 · Cited by 6,416
A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x · Cited by 3,802
Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research
Straub, D., & Gefen, D. (2004) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.01324 · Cited by 2,797
Metadata
- Authors
- Szajna, B.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 1994-09-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 319-324
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W2163507788
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 16.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Software Evaluation and Choice: Predictive Validation of the Technology Acceptance Instrument. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/249621
- The paper
- Szajna, B. (1994). Software Evaluation and Choice: Predictive Validation of the Technology Acceptance Instrument. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/249621
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
