A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test
Abstract
The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) has been widely used to predict user acceptance and use based on perceived ease of use and usefulness. However, in order to design effective training interventions to improve user acceptance, it is necessary to better understand the antecedents and determinants of key acceptance constructs. In this research, we focus on understanding the determinants of perceived ease of use. Data from three experiments spanning 108 subjects and six different systems supported our hypothesis that an individual's perception of a particular system's ease of use is anchored to her or his general computer self-efficacy at all times, and objective usability has an impact on ease of use perceptions about a specific system only after direct experience with the system. In addition to being an important research issue in user acceptance research, understanding antecedents of perceived ease of use is also important from a practical standpoint since several systems in which millions of dollars are invested are rejected because of poor user interfaces. Moreover, the actual underlying problem might be low computer self-efficacy of the target user group. In such cases, training interventions aimed at improving computer self-efficacy of users may be more effective than improved interface design for increasing user acceptance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TAM is a behavioural model developed by Davis in 1989 to predict user acceptance and use of new information technology based on perceived ease of use and usefulness.
“TAM is a behavioural model which was developed by Davis in 1989 to predict the user acceptance and use of new information technology based on its perceived ease of use and usefulness [33,34].”
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066 · see citing works
Self-citationAgarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250951 · Cited by 4,726 · see citing works
User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems1
van der Heijden, H. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148660 · Cited by 3,850 · see citing works
Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 · Cited by 2,458 · see citing works
Wu, J.-H., & Wang, S.-C. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001 · Cited by 2,284 · see citing works
Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology
Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1999.11518247 · Cited by 1,951 · see citing works
Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003 · Cited by 1,399 · see citing works
Vijayasarathy, L. R. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.011 · Cited by 1,218 · see citing works
Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics
Devaraj, S., Fan, M., & Kohli, R. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.316.77 · Cited by 1,205 · see citing works
Yi, M. Y., Jackson, J. D., Park, J. S., & Probst, J. C. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.08.006 · Cited by 1,139 · see citing works
Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036 · Cited by 986 · see citing works
An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment
Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Salam, A. F. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.010 · Cited by 922 · see citing works
Wu, I.-L., & Chen, J.-L. (2005) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.003 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance
Ong, C.-S., & Lai, J.-Y. (2006) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006 · Cited by 863 · see citing works
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., Chan, F. K. Y., Hu, P. J.-H., & Brown, S. A. (2011) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00373.x · Cited by 852 · see citing works
Self-citationAhuja, M. K., & Bennett, J. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148691 · Cited by 818 · see citing works
Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014 · Cited by 693 · see citing works
Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/17465660710834453 · Cited by 624 · see citing works
Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2011.10782576 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model
Yang, H.-D., & Yoo, Y. (2004) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(03)00062-9 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Predicting collaboration technology use: integrating technology adoption and collaboration research
Brown, S. A., Dennis, A. R., & Venkatesh, V. (2010) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222270201 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Self-citationCalisir, F., & Calisir, F. (2004) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.004 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Albayati, H., Kim, S. K., & Rho, J. J. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101320 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
What drives FinTech adoption? A multi-method evaluation using an adapted technology acceptance model
Singh, S., Sahni, M. M., & Kovid, R. K. (2020) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-09-2019-1318 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Kulviwat, S., Bruner, G. C., & Al-Shuridah, O. (2009) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.04.014 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Schaper, L. K., & Pervan, G. P. (2007) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.028 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Kim, T. G., Lee, J. H., & Law, R. (2008) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.016 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
The adoption of information technology in the sales force
Schillewaert, N., Ahearne, M. J., Frambach, R. T., & Moenaert, R. K. (2005) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.09.013 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Li, C.-Y. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.003 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Yen, D. C., Wu, C.-S., Cheng, F.-F., & Huang, Y.-W. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.005 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Pan, S., & Jordan-Marsh, M. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.015 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Five-factor model personality traits as predictors of perceived and actual usage of technology
Barnett, T., Pearson, A. W., Pearson, R., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2015) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.10 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Predictive factors of telemedicine service acceptance and behavioral intention of physicians
Rho, M. J., Choi, I. Y., & Lee, J. (2014) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.005 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Rajan, C. A., & Baral, R. (2015) · IIMB Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.iimb.2015.04.008 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
A cross-cultural investigation of consumer e-shopping adoption
Choi, J., & Geistfeld, L. V. (2004) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2003.08.006 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Useful, Social and Enjoyable: Mobile Phone Adoption by Older People
Conci, M., Pianesi, F., & Zancanaro, M. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_7 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement
Brandon-Jones, A., & Kauppi, K. (2018) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-06-2015-0346 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Predictors for e-government adoption: integrating TAM, TPB, trust and perceived risk.
Xie, Q., Song, W., Peng, X., & Shabbir, M. (2017) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-08-2015-0141 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Predicting the use of online information services based on a modified UTAUT model
Oh, J.-C., & Yoon, S.-J. (2014) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2013.872187 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Self-efficacy as an antecedent of cognition and affect in technology acceptance
Kulviwat, S., C. Bruner II, G., & P. Neelankavil, J. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-10-2013-0727 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Pan, J., Ding, S., Wu, D., Yang, S., & Yang, J. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1550272 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Rosli, M. S., Saleh, N. S., Md. Ali, A., Abu Bakar, S., & Mohd Tahir, L. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141811389 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Applying TAM to e-services adoption: the moderating role of perceived risk
Featherman, M., & Fuller, M. (2003) · 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the · doi:10.1109/hicss.2003.1174433 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Campbell, J. I., Aturinda, I., Mwesigwa, E., Burns, B., Santorino, D., Haberer, J. E., Bangsberg, D. R., Holden, R. J., Ware, N. C., & Siedner, M. J. (2017) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-017-1765-y · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Nursing students’ behavioral intention to use online courses: A questionnaire survey
Tung, F.-C., & Chang, S.-C. (2008) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.09.011 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Perceived versus actual computer-email-web fluency
Bunz, U., Curry, C., & Voon, W. (2007) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.008 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification
Serenko, A. (2008) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.04.004 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Shao, C., Nah, S., Makady, H., & McNealy, J. (2024) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2331858 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Understanding applicants’ reactions to gamified recruitment
Buil, I., Catalán, S., & Martínez, E. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.041 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Perceived system performance: a test of an extended technology acceptance model
Liu, L., & Ma, Q. (2006) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1161345.1161354 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Acceptance of 5 G technology: Mediation role of Trust and Concentration
Akbari, M., Rezvani, A., Shahriari, E., Zúñiga, M. Á., & Pouladian, H. (2020) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101585 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Effects and acceptance of precision education in an AI-supported smart learning environment
Hu, Y.-H. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10664-3 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
The impact of service level on the acceptance of application service oriented medical records
Liu, L., & Ma, Q. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.12.004 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
A new hybrid model for exploring the adoption of online nursing courses
Tung, F.-C., & Chang, S.-C. (2008) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2007.06.003 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Kifle, M., Payton, F. C., Mbarika, V., & Meso, P. (2010) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2009.0008 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
An Empirical Study of Some Critical Adoption Factors of ERP Software
Awa, H. O., Uko, J. P., & Ukoha, O. (2017) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1265828 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Sarosa, S. (2019) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.106 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Aldossary (2024) · doi:10.3390/info15040202 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Musyoka, C. M., Mbwayo, A., Donovan, D. M., & Mathai, M. (2023) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000177 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Venue
- Decision Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 451-481
- ISSN
- 0011-7315 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5915
- OpenAlex
- W2075647120
- Cited by
- 3,802
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 102 · 2025: 172 · 2024: 217 · 2023: 213 · 2022: 251 · 2021: 207 · 2020: 183 · 2019: 182 · 2018: 163 · 2017: 116 · 2016: 136 · 2015: 179 · 2014: 160 · 2013: 166 · 2012: 187
- FWCI
- 22.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Decision Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- perceived ease of use, technology acceptance model, computer self-efficacy, user acceptance, training program, user interface design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review