Cited by 3,802Technology Adoption and User BehaviourUsability and User Interface DesignInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test

Venkatesh, Viswanath, Davis, Fred D.·1996·Decision Sciences

Abstract

The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) has been widely used to predict user acceptance and use based on perceived ease of use and usefulness. However, in order to design effective training interventions to improve user acceptance, it is necessary to better understand the antecedents and determinants of key acceptance constructs. In this research, we focus on understanding the determinants of perceived ease of use. Data from three experiments spanning 108 subjects and six different systems supported our hypothesis that an individual's perception of a particular system's ease of use is anchored to her or his general computer self-efficacy at all times, and objective usability has an impact on ease of use perceptions about a specific system only after direct experience with the system. In addition to being an important research issue in user acceptance research, understanding antecedents of perceived ease of use is also important from a practical standpoint since several systems in which millions of dollars are invested are rejected because of poor user interfaces. Moreover, the actual underlying problem might be low computer self-efficacy of the target user group. In such cases, training interventions aimed at improving computer self-efficacy of users may be more effective than improved interface design for increasing user acceptance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Decision Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-09
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
451-481
ISSN
  • 0011-7315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5915
OpenAlex
W2075647120
Cited by
3,802
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 102 · 2025: 172 · 2024: 217 · 2023: 213 · 2022: 251 · 2021: 207 · 2020: 183 · 2019: 182 · 2018: 163 · 2017: 116 · 2016: 136 · 2015: 179 · 2014: 160 · 2013: 166 · 2012: 187
FWCI
22.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Decision Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
perceived ease of use, technology acceptance model, computer self-efficacy, user acceptance, training program, user interface design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review