The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Strategic Analysis of Electronic Marketplaces
Abstract
Information systems can serve as intermediaries between the buyers and the sellers in a vertical market, thus creating an “electronic marketplace. ” A major impact of these electronic market systems is that they typically reduce the search costs buyers must pay to obtain information about the prices and product offerings available in the market. Economic theory suggests that this reduction in search costs plays a major role in determining the implications of these systems for market efficiency and competitive behavior. This article draws on economic models of search and examines how prices, seller profits, and buyer welfare are affected by reducing search costs in commodity and differentiated markets. This reduction results in direct efficiency gains from reduced intermediation costs and in indirect but possibly larger gains in allocational efficiency from better-informed buyers. Because electronic market systems generally reduce buyers’ search costs, they ultimately increase the efficiency of interorganizational transactions, in the process affecting the market power of buyers and sellers. The economic characteristics of electronic marketplaces, in addition to their ability to reduce search costs, create numerous possibilities for the strategic use of these systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior
Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(01)00056-2 · Cited by 3,219
E-satisfaction and e-loyalty: A contingency framework
Anderson, R. E., & Srinivasan, S. S. (2003) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.10063 · Cited by 2,310
Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces
Bakos, J. Y. (1997) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.43.12.1676 · Cited by 2,259
Self-citationExploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing
Peterson, R. A., Balasubramanian, S., & Bronnenberg, B. J. (1997) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070397254005 · Cited by 1,373
Identifying key factors affecting consumer purchase behavior in an online shopping context
Park, C., & Kim, Y. (2003) · International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management · doi:10.1108/09590550310457818 · Cited by 914
Metadata
- Authors
- Bakos, J. Y.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 1991-09-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-310
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W2118936359
- Cited by
- 1,224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Strategic Analysis of Electronic Marketplaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/249641
- The paper
- Bakos, J. Y. (1991). A Strategic Analysis of Electronic Marketplaces. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/249641
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.