The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing Health Information Systems in Developing Countries: The Flexible Standards Strategy1
Abstract
The development of appropriate integrated and scalable information systems in the health sector in developing countries has been difficult to achieve, and is likely to remain elusive in the face of continued fragmented funding of health programs, particularly related to the HIV/AIDS epidemic. In this article, we propose a strategy for developing information infrastructures in general and in particular for the health care sector in developing countries. We use complexity science to explain the challenges that need to be addressed, in particular the need for standards that can adapt to a changing health care environment, and propose the concept of flexible standards as a key element in a sustainable infrastructure development strategy. Drawing on case material from a number of developing countries, a case is built around the use of flexible standards as attractors, arguing that if they are well defined and simple, they will be able to adapt to the frequent changes that are experienced in the complex health environment. A number of paradoxes are highlighted as useful strategies, integrated independence being one that encourages experimentation and heterogeneity to develop and share innovative solutions while still conforming to simple standards. The article provides theoretical concepts to support standardization processes in complex systems, and to suggest an approach to implement health standards in developing country settings that is sensitive to the local context, allows change to occur through small steps, and provides a mechanism for scaling information systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. M. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261725 · Cited by 17,711
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001 · Cited by 6,188
The challenge of complexity in health care
Plsek, P. E., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625 · Cited by 2,578
Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations
Heeks, R. (2002) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240290075039 · Cited by 1,390
Wilson, T., Holt, T., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7314.685 · Cited by 447
Enterprise resource planning: introduction
Kumar, K., & van Hillegersberg, J. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/332051.332063 · Cited by 372
Kimaro, H. C., & Nhampossa, J. L. (2005) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1002/itdj.20016 · Cited by 163
Cited by
Service innovation in the digital age: Key contributions and future directions
Barrett, M., Davidson, E., Prabhu, J., & Vargo, S. L. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39:1.03 · Cited by 956
GREENHALGH, T., POTTS, H. W. W., WONG, G., BARK, P., & SWINGLEHURST, D. (2009) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00578.x · Cited by 541
A Usability Study of a Mobile Health Application for Rural Ghanaian Midwives
Vélez, O., Okyere, P. B., Kanter, A. S., & Bakken, S. (2014) · Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health · doi:10.1111/jmwh.12071 · Cited by 105
District decision-making for health in low-income settings: a systematic literature review
Wickremasinghe, D., Hashmi, I. E., Schellenberg, J., & Avan, B. I. (2016) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czv124 · Cited by 91
Scaling of HIS in a global context: Same, same, but different
Sahay, S., Sæbø, J., & Braa, J. (2013) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.08.002 · Cited by 31
Self-citationNyame-Asiamah, F. (2020) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2019.1650326 · Cited by 28
Supporting immunization programs with improved vaccine cold chain information systems
Anderson, R., Perrier, T., Pervaiz, F., Sisouveth, N., Kumar, B., Phongphila, S., Rahman, A., Dhiman, R., & Newland, S. (2014) · IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC 2014) · doi:10.1109/ghtc.2014.6970284 · Cited by 23
Moodley, D., Pillay, A. W., & Seebregts, C. J. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32355-3_8 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Braa, J., Hanseth, O., Heywood, A., Mohammed, W., & Shaw, V.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 381-402
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W2135519107
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 57.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.