Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Making Native Space: Colonialism, Resistance and Reserves in British Columbia

Lutz, John, Harris, Cole·2004·Labour / Le Travail

Abstract

Figures and Illustrations Acknowledgments Introduction Part 1: The Colonial Period 1. The Imperial Background 2. The Douglas Years, 1850-64 3. Ideology and Land Policy, 1864-71 Part 2: Province and Dominion 4. The Confederation Years, 1871-76 5. The Joint Indian Reserve Commission, 1876-78 6. Sproat and the Native Voice, 1878-80 Part 3: Filling in the Map 7. O'Reilly, Bureaucracy, and Reserves, 1880-98 8. Imposing a Solution, 1898-1938 Part 4: Land and Livelihood 9. Native Space 10. Towards a Postcolonial Land Policy Appendix: Indian Reserves in British Columbia during the Colonial Period Notes Source Notes for Maps Bibliography Index

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/25149464

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Lutz, J., & Harris, C.
Venue
Labour / Le Travail
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2004
Volume
53
Pages
281
ISSN
0700-3862 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W605046451
Cited by
296
References
0
FWCI
60.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making Native Space: Colonialism, Resistance and Reserves in British Columbia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/25149464
The paper
Lutz, J., & Harris, C. (2004). Making Native Space: Colonialism, Resistance and Reserves in British Columbia. Labour / Le Travail. https://doi.org/10.2307/25149464

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.