Unsettling the Myth of Canadian Nationhood: Hockey and Embodied Indigenous Sovereignties
Abstract
We situate the race-based division of Manitoba’s Keystone Junior Hockey League as a case study to reveal the ongoing processes of settler colonialism. We argue that this split is an example of “White settler possessive logics,” whereby settler belonging is naturalized through reiterative embodied acts of occupation. That this split happened in hockey, which is colloquially referred to as “Canada’s game,” is perhaps unsurprising given that hockey is a significant cultural site where Canadian nationhood is produced. However, we also contend that settler entitlement and belonging are never fully secure, but rather always in the process of (un)becoming. Settler belonging is thus threatened by Indigenous embodied sovereignties, which we argue can be found in the game of hockey generally, and in the Keystone Junior Hockey League specifically.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The presence of Indigenous families in hockey should be a welcome expectation, but Indigenous athletes have largely been treated as unwanted interlopers in settler-colonial societies.
“Therefore, the presence of Indigenous families in the sport should be a welcome expectation, but like many aspects of settler-colonial societies Indigenous athletes have largely been treated as unwanted interlopers (Arcand et al., 2021;McLeod & McKegney, 2021;Norman et al., 2022).”
From Indigenizing Sport Research: Analyzing Protective Factors of Exercising Sovereignty in North America (2023) · cites this paper as Norman et al., 2022
Cites
Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native
Wolfe, P. (2006) · Journal of Genocide Research · doi:10.1080/14623520601056240 · Cited by 6,491 · see citing works
As We Have Always Done: Indigenous Freedom through Radical Resistance
SIMPSON, L. B. (2017) · doi:10.5749/j.ctt1pwt77c · Cited by 2,010 · see citing works
Mark My Words: Native Women Mapping Our Nations
Goeman, M. (2013) · doi:10.5749/minnesota/9780816677900.001.0001 · Cited by 662 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indigenizing Sport Research: Analyzing Protective Factors of Exercising Sovereignty in North America
Ali-Joseph, A., Leonard, K., & Welch, N. (2023) · Sociology of Sport Journal · doi:10.1123/ssj.2023-0006 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Norman, M. E., Petherick, L., & Albert, E. (.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Community Liaison, Health Centre of Excellence, Norway House Cree Nation, MB, Canada
- Venue
- Sociology of Sport Journal
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2022-12-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 323-332
- ISSN
- 0741-1235 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-2785
- OpenAlex
- W4226424073
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sociology of Sport Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Physical Education and Sports Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Keywords
- Canadian nationhood, settler colonialism, Indigenous sovereignty, embodiment, junior hockey, sport and national identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review