The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392563 · Cited by 4,372
Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the Job Satisfaction Survey
Spector, P. E. (1985) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00929796 · Cited by 2,091
Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations.
Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.349 · Cited by 1,822
Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software
West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x · Cited by 1,136
Incentive contracts and performance measurement
Baker, G. P. (1992) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261831 · Cited by 1,085
Metadata
- Authors
- Lazarus, H., & Lawler, E. E.
- Venue
- Industrial and Labor Relations Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1972-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 451
- ISSN
- 0019-7939 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970699376
- Cited by
- 823
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 54.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2521335
- The paper
- Lazarus, H., & Lawler, E. E. (1972). Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2521335
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
