Cited by 1,085Auction Theory and ApplicationsAccounting and Organizational ManagementLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems

Incentive contracts and performance measurement

Baker, George P.·1992·Journal of Political Economy

Abstract

This paper examines the characteristics of incentive contracts in which the agent's payoff is not based on the principal's objective. I show that contracts based on such performance measures will not in general provide first-best incentives, even when the agent is risk neutral. The form of the optimal contract and the efficiency of this contract depend on the relationship between the performance measure used and the principal's objective. The model provides a simple and intuitive statistical measure that serves as a metric for the efficiency of a performance measure. Applications to various incentive contracting situations, including the "gaming" of performance measures, the use of revenue-based sales commissions, and relative performance evaluation, are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/261831

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is well known from practice and theory that explicit performance incentives may be harmful because they induce employees to concentrate only on rewarded tasks and neglect non-rewarded tasks.

    “It is well known from practice (Kerr 1975) and from theory (Holmström and Milgrom 1991, Baker 1992) that in this situation explicit performance incentives may be harmful because they induce the employees to concentrate only on the rewarded tasks and to neglect the non-rewarded tasks.”

    From Psychological foundations of incentives (2002) · cites this paper as Baker 1992

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, G. P.
Corresponding author
Baker, George P.
Venue
Journal of Political Economy
Published
1992-06
Volume
100
Issue
3
Pages
598-614
ISSN
  • 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-534X
OpenAlex
W2055022672
Cited by
1,085
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 56
FWCI
8.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Political Economy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Auction Theory and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Accounting and Organizational Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Keywords
incentive contracts, performance measurement, agency theory, risk-neutral agents, optimal contracts, contract efficiency, relative performance evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review