The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough?
Abstract
This volume constitutes the papers and discussions from a symposium on Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough? held at the General Motors Research Laboratories on October 8-9, 1979. This symposium was the twenty-fourth in an annual series sponsored by the Research Laboratories. Initi- ated in 1957, these symposia have as their objective the promotion of the interchange ofknowledge among specialists from many allied disciplines in rapidly developing or changing areas ofscience or technology. Attendees characteristically represent the academic, government, and industrial institutions that are noted for their ongoing activities in the particular area of interest. The objective of this symposium was to develop a balanced view of the current status of societal risk assessment's role in the public policy process and then to establish, if possible, future directions of research. Accordingly, the symposium was structured in two dimensions; certainty versus uncertainty and the subjective versus the objective. Furthermore, people representing extremely diverse discip- lines concerned with the perception, quantification, and abatement of risks were brought together to provide an environment that stimulated the exchange of ideas and experiences. The keys to this exchange were the invited papers, arranged into four symposium sessions. These papers appear in this volume in the order of their presentation. The discussions that in turn followed from the papers are also included.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Slovic, P. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3563507 · Cited by 9,271
Sensation seeking and risky behavior
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-2321 · Cited by 600
Preference for robot service or human service in hotels? Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic
Kim, S. (., Kim, J., Badu-Baiden, F., Giroux, M., & Choi, Y. (2021) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102795 · Cited by 567
The role of risk perception for risk management
Renn, O. (1998) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(97)00119-1 · Cited by 353
Stanton, N. A., & Salmon, P. M. (2009) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2008.03.006 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Mallenby, D. W., Schwing, R. C., & Albers, W. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Risk and Insurance
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1983-09
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 548
- ISSN
- 0022-4367 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058428890
- Cited by
- 479
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 132.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/252450
- The paper
- Mallenby, D. W., Schwing, R. C., & Albers, W. A. (1983). Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough? The Journal of Risk and Insurance. https://doi.org/10.2307/252450
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.