The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple Range Tests for Correlated and Heteroscedastic Means
Abstract
Miultiple range tests have been developed by several writers, for example, D. Newmiian [8], M. Keuls [5], J. W. Tukey [10] anid D. B. Duincani [3], for testinig differenices between several treatmenlt means in cases inl which all such differences are of equal a priori interest. These tests, which are also described in recent textbooks, for example, W. T. Federer [4, chapter 2], have been worked out for data in which the treatment means are homoscedastic (have equal variances) and are uncorrelated. Recently, C. Y. Kramer [6] has presented a simple miethod for extending these procedures to give useful tests for differences between means with unequal replications, the method being applicable to aniy set of heteroscedastic unicorrelated means. In a subsequent paper [7], the same authorl has given further extensions to tests of mneanis which are also correlated, such as the adjusted means from analyses of covariance or from incomplete block designs. Similar work has also been done by E. Bleicher [1] and P. G. Sanders [9] in extendinig a multiple F test to making tests in lattice and rectangular lattice designs. One purpose of this paper is to present a more complete method for these extensions which lnecessarily sacrifices a little in simplicity but is more powerful, especially in cases in which the differences between the mneans have appreciably different varianices. Another purpose is to incdicate briefly the closeniess of the properties of these complete tests of heteroscedastic and correlated meanis to those of the corresponding tests of homoscedastic and unicorrelated mieans. Incidcental to these main ptirposes, a shor t-cut skippinig priniciple, useful in applyilng multiple ranige tests to a large lntum-ber of treatmenit means (or totals), is also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Extension of Multiple Range Tests to Group Means with Unequal Numbers of Replications
Kramer, C. Y. (1956) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001469 · Cited by 3,146
The use of the „studentized range” in connection with an analysis of variance
Keuls, M. (1952) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/bf01908269 · Cited by 635
NEWMAN, D. (1939) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/31.1-2.20 · Cited by 567
Cited by
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 26,755
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Marchesini, G., Brizi, M., Bianchi, G., Tomassetti, S., Bugianesi, E., Lenzi, M., McCullough, A. J., Natale, S., Forlani, G., & Melchionda, N. (2001) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diabetes.50.8.1844 · Cited by 2,581
Kathiresan, K., Manivannan, S., Nabeel, M. A., & Dhivya, B. (2009) · Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.01.016 · Cited by 647
Cinnamaldehyde--a potential antidiabetic agent
Subash Babu, P., Prabuseenivasan, S., & Ignacimuthu, S. (2007) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2006.11.005 · Cited by 477
Goldman, P. S., Rosvold, H. E., Vest, B., & Galkin, T. W. (1971) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031649 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Duncan, D. B.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1957-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 164
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2324761579
- Cited by
- 959
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Range Tests for Correlated and Heteroscedastic Means. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2527799
- The paper
- Duncan, D. B. (1957). Multiple Range Tests for Correlated and Heteroscedastic Means. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.