The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A General Methodology for the Analysis of Experiments with Repeated Measurement of Categorical Data
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the analysis of multivariate categorical data which are obtained from repeated measurement experiments. An expository discussion of pertinent hypotheses for such situations is given, and appropriate test statistics are developed through the application of weighted least squares methods. Special consideration is given to computational problems associated with the manipulation of large tables including the treatment of empty cells. Three applications of the methodology are provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Self-citationThe use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance
Friedman, M. (1937) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522 · Cited by 7,005
THE COMPARISON OF PERCENTAGES IN MATCHED SAMPLES
COCHRAN, W. G. (1950) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/37.3-4.256 · Cited by 1,465
The Two-Period Change-Over Design and Its Use in Clinical Trials
Grizzle, J. E. (1965) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2528104 · Cited by 784
Cited by
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Self-citationRegression Models for Ordinal Data
McCullagh, P. (1980) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01109.x · Cited by 4,453
Modeling the Drop-Out Mechanism in Repeated-Measures Studies
Little, R. J. A. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476615 · Cited by 1,522
When and why defaults influence decisions: a meta-analysis of default effects
JACHIMOWICZ, J. M., DUNCAN, S., WEBER, E. U., & JOHNSON, E. J. (2019) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2018.43 · Cited by 481
A One-Way Components of Variance Model for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529465 · Cited by 478
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Koch, G. G., Landis, J. R., Freeman, J. L., Freeman, D. H., & Lehnen, R. G.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1977-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088041869
- Cited by
- 609
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A General Methodology for the Analysis of Experiments with Repeated Measurement of Categorical Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2529309
- The paper
- Koch, G. G., Landis, J. R., Freeman, J. L., Freeman, D. H., & Lehnen, R. G. (1977). A General Methodology for the Analysis of Experiments with Repeated Measurement of Categorical Data. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
