The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A One-Way Components of Variance Model for Categorical Data
Abstract
A components of variance model for categorical data from unbalanced designs which is directly analogous to a one-way random effects ANO VA modelfor quantitative data is proposed. The variance components provide separate reliability measures for each of the response categories and disagreement measures between pairs of response categories in terms of (within subject) intraclass and interclass correlation coefficients. The estimation procedures involve usual MA NOVA calculations which can be expressed as compounded functions of the multinomial observations. Thus, the variances of these estimates can be obtainedfrom linearized Taylor series results. These procedures are illustrated with data from a psychiatric diagnosis study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Self-citationMeasuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.
Fleiss, J. L. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031619 · Cited by 8,733
SCHEFFE, H. (1960) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-196006000-00016 · Cited by 5,516
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529786 · Cited by 4,332
Self-citationFleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447303300309 · Cited by 3,354
Searle, S. R., & Searle, S. R. (1971) · Cited by 3,229
Statistical Theory in Research.
Eisenhart, C., Anderson, R. L., & Bancroft, T. A. (1953) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2281294 · Cited by 613
A General Methodology for the Analysis of Experiments with Repeated Measurement of Categorical Data
Koch, G. G., Landis, J. R., Freeman, J. L., Freeman, D. H., & Lehnen, R. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529309 · Cited by 609
Self-citationLandis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1975) · Statistica Neerlandica · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9574.1975.tb00254.x · Cited by 135
Self-citationA general methodology for the measurement of observer agreement when the data are categorical
Landis, J. R. (1975) · NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries) · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Cited by
Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069408 · Cited by 1,312
Beyond kappa: a review of interrater agreement measures
Banerjee, M., Capozzoli, M., McSweeney, L., & Sinha, D. (1999) · Canadian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.2307/3315487 · Cited by 976
Wilson, J. T. L., Hareendran, A., Grant, M., Baird, T., Schulz, U. G. R., Muir, K. W., & Bone, I. (2002) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000027437.22450.bd · Cited by 855
Greater sciatic notch morphology: Sex, age, and population differences
Walker, P. L. (2005) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.10422 · Cited by 380
Cunliffe, A. M., Brazier, R. E., & Anderson, K. (2016) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2016.05.019 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1977-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 671
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2333141530
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A One-Way Components of Variance Model for Categorical Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2529465
- The paper
- Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). A One-Way Components of Variance Model for Categorical Data. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529465
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
