The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Analysis of Residuals in Cross-Classified Tables
Abstract
In regression analysis and analysis of variance, examination of residuals forms an important part of good statistical practice (see Draper and Smith [1966]). More general uses of residuals have also been explored by Cox and Snell [1968]. In this paper, methods of residual analysis developed for loglinear models for cross-classified tables by Haberman [1972b] are used to examine models for quantal response and for complete and incomplete r X c contingency tables. Section 2 contains a brief summary of results of Haberman [1972b] which are used in this paper. A more complete summary is provided in the appendix. In section 3, residual analysis is used in the hypothesis of row and column independence in a complete r X c table. In section 4, methods are developed appropriate for analysis of quasi-independence models in incomplete r X c tables, and in section 5, methods for use in logit analysis are considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s303 · Cited by 17,923
Tukey, J. W. (1962) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177704711 · Cited by 1,860
A General Definition of Residuals
Cox, D. R., & Snell, E. J. (1968) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1968.tb00724.x · Cited by 1,311
(2022) · United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) Reports · doi:10.18356/9789210010030c014 · Cited by 560
Goodman, L. A. (1968) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1968.10480916 · Cited by 465
The Analysis of Incomplete Multi-Way Contingency Tables
Fienberg, S. E. (1972) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2528967 · Cited by 76
Mantel, N. (1970) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529076 · Cited by 52
Cited by
Beasley, T. M., & Schumacker, R. E. (1995) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.1995.9943797 · Cited by 748
Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings
Sheen, Y. (2004) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168804lr146oa · Cited by 615
Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake
Sheen, Y. (2006) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168806lr203oa · Cited by 386
Machine Learning approach for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0
Paolanti, M., Romeo, L., Felicetti, A., Mancini, A., Frontoni, E., & Loncarski, J. (2018) · 2018 14th IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (MESA) · doi:10.1109/mesa.2018.8449150 · Cited by 296
Riparian Vegetation Recovery Patterns Following Stream Channelization: A Geomorphic Perspective
Hupp, C. R. (1992) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940670 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Haberman, S. J.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1973-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 205
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2325276118
- Cited by
- 1,016
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 2.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Analysis of Residuals in Cross-Classified Tables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2529686
- The paper
- Haberman, S. J. (1973). The Analysis of Residuals in Cross-Classified Tables. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529686
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
