The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cancer Survival Corrected for Heterogeneity in Patient Withdrawal
Abstract
Survival from cancer over a certain time period is often measured by the 'relative survival rate'. This is the ratio of the observed survival rate in the group of patients to the survival rate expected in a group of people in the general population, who are similar to the patients with respect to all of the possible factors affecting survival at the beginning of the period, except for the disease under study. When patterns of patient withdrawal differ for a number of subgroups of patients with equal relative survival rates, the current method of derivation of the relative survival rate is biased. A method based on the concept of an 'expected life table' is proposed for removal of the bias. Examples based on material from the Finnish Cancer Registry suggest that the practical performance of the proposed method is better than that of other alternatives, even when the relative survival rates in the subgroups are not equal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cervantes, F., Dupriez, B., Pereira, A., Passamonti, F., Reilly, J. T., Morra, E., Vannucchi, A. M., Mesa, R. A., Demory, J.-L., Barosi, G., et al. (2009) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2008-07-170449 · Cited by 1,255
EUROCARE-4. Survival of cancer patients diagnosed in 1995–1999. Results and commentary
Sant, M., Allemani, C., Santaquilani, M., Knijn, A., Marchesi, F., & Capocaccia, R. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.018 · Cited by 1,021
Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD)
Coleman, M. P., Quaresma, M., Berrino, F., Lutz, J.-M., De Angelis, R., Capocaccia, R., Baili, P., Rachet, B., Gatta, G., Hakulinen, T., et al. (2008) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70179-7 · Cited by 1,002
Self-citationLong-term patient survival in ANCA-associated vasculitis
Flossmann, O., Berden, A., de Groot, K., Hagen, C., Harper, L., Heijl, C., Höglund, P., Jayne, D., Luqmani, R., Mahr, A., et al. (2011) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.2010.137778 · Cited by 939
Interpreting trends in cancer patient survival
DICKMAN, P. W., & ADAMI, H. ‐. (2006) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01677.x · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Hakulinen, T.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1982-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 933
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2313027250
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Survival Corrected for Heterogeneity in Patient Withdrawal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2529873
- The paper
- Hakulinen, T. (1982). Cancer Survival Corrected for Heterogeneity in Patient Withdrawal. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529873
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.