A Dynamic Model of the Transmission of Price Information in Auto Insurance Markets
Abstract
A Dynamic Model of the Transmission of Price Information in Auto Insurance Markets Abstract A model of the demand structure of auto insurance markets is constructed in which consumers learn about firms through friends and neighbors. Consumers firms when the price differential exceeds a certain threshold, the switch cost. Data from New York and Alberta auto insurance markets are used to measure costs and the effective speed of transmission of information in these markets. Introduction A dominant theme in the literature exploring the implications of imperfect knowledge on the part of market participants has been that the way in which information is transmitted among and processed by agents is a critical determinant of market dynamics and outcomes [Rothschild (1973), Holmstrom (1984), Rogerson (1983), Shapiro (1982)]. In discussing the consumer's problem of searching for the lowest price in markets with price dispersion, Rothschild (1974) noted that, although demand functions are determined by the rules which searchers follow, very little empirical work had been done to determine how consumers actually gather information in these markets. In this article, a model of the demand structure of auto insurance markets is constructed which is consistent with the observed process by which consumers gather price information in those markets. The model is static on the firm side with no entry or exit. At period t = 0 a given group of firms sets prices which do not vary over the remaining periods. Consumers gradually learn about these prices. Proceeding in this manner allows modelling in detail the dynamics of the demand structure, generating the market shares of all firms in each time period. The focus of the literature on price dispersion in markets has been on equilibrium outcome [Carlson and McAfee (1983), Pratt, Wise and Zeckhauser (1979)] which in real-world markets may be reached only after many years, or not at all, given the random events and structural changes in the institutional environment. Constructing a dynamic model of the demand structure allows measurement of the effective speed of transmission of information in the markets for auto insurance in Alberta from 1976 through 1980 and in New York State from 1977 through 1983. The result is a model in which markets slowly tend to an equilibrium as agents learn about the structure of the marketplace, rather than one in which markets are always in equilibrium, instantly adjusting to exogenous shocks. The focus is on only the demand side of the market. Equilibrium search models which illustrate the behavior of firms rely on simplifying assumptions regarding the demand structure. In this model the complexity of the demand structure precludes the use of analytical techniques on the firm side. Dahlby and West (1986) have recently used an extensive set of auto insurance data from Alberta to test Carlson and McAfee's equilibrium price dispersion model which makes the following assumptions: (1) consumers know the distribution of prices, (2) all firms are equally likely to be sampled in the search process, and (3) the market is in equilibrium. In the model presented in this article, on the other hand, consumers are not assumed to know the distribution of prices. More importantly, a key feature which is not present in other search models is that a firm with larger market share is more likely to be sampled in the search process because it will have more consumers disseminating information about the firm, and will generally have more marketing outlets facilitating contact with prospective consumers. The model is fitted to data from New York State and the Dahlby and West study, and the results are compared. The empirical evidence on consumer information acquisition patterns and the existence of price dispersion in auto insurance markets are first discussed. Then the model of consumer demand is developed and empirically tested, followed by a summary. …
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The switching costs for insurance services include search costs, habit, learning, inertia, and transaction costs.
“The switching costs for insurance services include–search costs (the costs of time invested in searching for the information about claims settlement), habit (investment oriented behavior), learning (financial strength of the insurance company), inertia, costs of transaction in terms of contractual and continuity (the costs of time and effort desired for price bargain and administrative charges) as”
From Health insurance policy renewal: an exploration of reputation, performance, and affect to understand customer inertia (2022) · cites this paper as Berger et al. 1989
Cites
A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research
Gatignon, H., & Robertson, T. S. (1985) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209021 · Cited by 1,209 · see citing works
Searching for the Lowest Price When the Distribution of Prices Is Unknown
Rothschild, M. (1974) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260229 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Price Differences in Almost Competitive Markets
Pratt, J. W., Wise, D. A., & Zeckhauser, R. (1979) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1883191 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Cartels, competition and regulation in the property-liability insurance industry
Joskow, P. L. (1992) · Hübner international series on risk, insurance, and economic security · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7957-5_24 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Price Dispersion in an Automobile Insurance Market
Dahlby, B., & West, D. S. (1986) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261380 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Imperfect Markets through Lack of Knowledge
Ożga, S. A. (1960) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884132 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
A behavioral model of the adoption of protective activities
Kunreuther, H. C., Sanderson, W. C., & Vetschera, R. (1985) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(85)90022-8 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationAutomobile Insurance Rates in Chicago, Illinois
Jung, A. F. (1978) · Journal of Risk & Insurance · doi:10.2307/251771 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Mate, K. V. (1981) · University Microfilms International eBooks · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Consumer Information and Decisions to Switch Insurers
Schlesinger, H., & von der Schulenburg, J.-M. G. (1993) · The Journal of Risk and Insurance · doi:10.2307/253381 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
The coexistence of distribution systems under price search: Theory and some evidence from insurance
Posey, L. L., & Tennyson, S. (1998) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(97)00100-5 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Kautish, P., Khare, A., & Sharma, R. (2022) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/s41270-021-00134-7 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Berger, L. A., Kleindorfer, P. R., & Kunreuther, H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Risk and Insurance
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17
- ISSN
- 0022-4367 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019057157
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 9.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Risk & Insurance (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Insurance and Financial Risk Management
- Keywords
- price dispersion, consumer search behavior, imperfect information, demand structure, switch costs, market learning, equilibrium search model, market share, dynamic demand model, market entry and exit
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review