Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

General Relative-Risk Models for Survival Time and Matched Case-Control Analysis

Thomas, Duncan C.·1981·Biometrics

Abstract

A general likelihood is derived for survival time and matched case-control analysis. It allows alternatives to the usual exponential dependence of relative risk on exposure variables; instead this dependence can be modelled in terms of any specific parametric function. These general relative risk models are particularly useful for study of forms of dose-response relationships with a single continuous exposure variable and forms of interactions between multiple exposure variables (continuous or discrete). Illustrative applications to data [for Quebec] on the risks of lung cancer in relation to smoking and asbestos exposure are presented. (summary in FRE) (EXCERPT)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2530149

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, D. C.
Venue
Biometrics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1981-12
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
673
ISSN
0006-341X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003603025
Cited by
183
References
3
FWCI
8.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: General Relative-Risk Models for Survival Time and Matched Case-Control Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2530149
The paper
Thomas, D. C. (1981). General Relative-Risk Models for Survival Time and Matched Case-Control Analysis. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2530149

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.