The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Correspondence Analysis of Incidence and Abundance Data: Properties in Terms of a Unimodal Response Model
Open accessAbstract
Correspondence analysis is commonly used by ecologists to analyze data on the incidence or abundance of species in samples.The first few axes are interpreted as latent variables and are presumed to relate to underlying environmental variables.In this paper correspondence analysis is shown to approximate the maximum likelihood solution of explicit unimodal response models in one latent variable.These models are logistic-linear for presence/absence data and loglinear for Poisson counts, with predictors that are quadratic in the latent variable.The approximation is best when the maxima and tolerances (widths) of the response curves are equal and the species' optima and the sample values of the latent variable are equally spaced.It is still fairly good for uniformly distributed optima and sample values, as shown by simulation.For the models extended to two latent variables, the approximation is often ba:d because of the horseshoe effect in correspondence analysis, but improves considerably in the simulations when this effect is removed as it is in detrended correspondence analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss—Newton method
WEDDERBURN, R. W. M. (1974) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/61.3.439 · Cited by 2,122
Cited by
Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data
Legendre, P., & Gallagher, E. D. (2001) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420100716 · Cited by 5,556
Ter Braak, C. J. F., & Prentice, I. C. (1988) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60183-x · Cited by 1,963
Self-citationPutting Things in Even Better Order: The Advantages of Canonical Correspondence Analysis
Palmer, M. W. (1993) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939575 · Cited by 1,161
Mapping the Ideological Marketplace
Bonica, A. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12062 · Cited by 680
Weighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response model
Braak, C. J. F., & Looman, C. W. N. (1986) · Vegetatio · doi:10.1007/bf00032121 · Cited by 553
Metadata
- Authors
- ter Braak, C. J. F.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1985-12
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 859
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2313706987
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correspondence Analysis of Incidence and Abundance Data: Properties in Terms of a Unimodal Response Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2530959
- The paper
- ter Braak, C. J. F. (1985). Correspondence Analysis of Incidence and Abundance Data: Properties in Terms of a Unimodal Response Model. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2530959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.