The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variance Calculations and Confidence Intervals for Estimates of the Attributable Risk Based on Logistic Models
Abstract
The attributable risk (AR), defined as AR = [Pr(disease) - Pr(disease/no exposure)]/Pr(disease), measures the proportion of disease risk that is attributable to an exposure. Recently Bruzzi et al. (1985, American Journal of Epidemiology 122, 904-914) presented point estimates of AR based on logistic models for case-control data to allow for confounding factors and secondary exposures. To produce confidence intervals, we derived variance estimates for AR under the logistic model and for various designs for sampling controls. Calculations for discrete exposure and confounding factors require covariances between estimates of the risk parameters of the logistic model and the proportions of cases with given levels of exposure and confounding factors. These covariances are estimated from Taylor series expansions applied to implicit functions. Similar calculations for continuous exposures are derived using influence functions. Simulations indicate that those asymptotic procedures yield reliable variance estimates and confidence intervals with near nominal coverage. An example illustrates the usefulness of variance calculations in selecting a logistic model that is neither so simplified as to exhibit systematic lack of fit nor so complicated as to inflate the variance of the estimate of AR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data.
BRUZZI, P., GREEN, S. B., BYAR, D. P., BRINTON, L. A., & SCHAIRER, C. (1985) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114174 · Cited by 1,214
PROPORTION OF DISEASE CAUSED OR PREVENTED BY A GIVEN EXPOSURE, TRAIT OR INTERVENTION1
MIETTINEN, O. S. (1974) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121617 · Cited by 1,036
Cited by
Yusuf, S., Hawken, S., Ôunpuu, S., Dans, T., Avezum, A., Lanas, F., McQueen, M., Budaj, A., Pais, P., Varigos, J., et al. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17018-9 · Cited by 12,026
O'Donnell, M. J., Xavier, D., Liu, L., Zhang, H., Chin, S. L., Rao-Melacini, P., Rangarajan, S., Islam, S., Pais, P., McQueen, M. J., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60834-3 · Cited by 3,448
Yusuf, S., Hawken, S., Ôunpuu, S., Bautista, L., Franzosi, M. G., Commerford, P., Lang, C. C., Rumboldt, Z., Onen, C. L., Lisheng, L., et al. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67663-5 · Cited by 2,903
Rosengren, A., Hawken, S., Ôunpuu, S., Sliwa, K., Zubaid, M., Almahmeed, W. A., Blackett, K. N., Sitthi-amorn, C., Sato, H., & Yusuf, S. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17019-0 · Cited by 2,414
O'Donnell, M. J., Chin, S. L., Rangarajan, S., Xavier, D., Liu, L., Zhang, H., Rao-Melacini, P., Zhang, X., Pais, P., Agapay, S., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30506-2 · Cited by 2,296
Metadata
- Authors
- Benichou, J., & Gail, M. H.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 991
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2322333854
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variance Calculations and Confidence Intervals for Estimates of the Attributable Risk Based on Logistic Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2532443
- The paper
- Benichou, J., & Gail, M. H. (1990). Variance Calculations and Confidence Intervals for Estimates of the Attributable Risk Based on Logistic Models. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532443
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.