The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnostic Plots to Reveal Functional Form for Covariates in Multiplicative Intensity Models
Abstract
We show how plots based on the residuals from a proportional hazards model may be used to reveal the correct functional form for covariates in the model. A smoothed plot of the martingale residues was suggested for this purpose by Therneau, Grambsch, and Fleming (1990, Biometrika 77, 147-160); however, its consistency required that the covariates be independent. They also noted that the plot could be biased for large covariate effects. We introduce two refinements which overcome these difficulties. The first is based on a ratio of scatter plot smooths, where the numerator is the smooth of the observed count plotted against the covariate, and the denominator is a smooth of the expected count. This is related to the Arjas goodness-of-fit plot (1988, Journal of the American Statistical Association 83, 204-212). The second technique smooths the martingale residuals divided by the expected count, using expected count as a weight. This latter approach is related to a GLM partial residual plot, as well as to the iterative methods of Hastie and Tibshirani (1990, Biometrics 46, 1005-1016) and Gentleman and Crowley (1991, Biometrics 47, 1283-1296). Applications to survival data sets are given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals
GRAMBSCH, P. M., & THERNEAU, T. M. (1994) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.515 · Cited by 5,885
Self-citationCox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study
Andersen, P. K., & Gill, R. D. (1982) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176345976 · Cited by 4,419
Cited by
Revised International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Greenberg, P. L., Tuechler, H., Schanz, J., Sanz, G., Garcia-Manero, G., Solé, F., Bennett, J. M., Bowen, D., Fenaux, P., Dreyfus, F., et al. (2012) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2012-03-420489 · Cited by 2,844
Giles, L. C., Glonek, G. F. V., Luszcz, M. A., & Andrews, G. R. (2005) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2004.025429 · Cited by 323
Survival After Bilateral Versus Single-Lung Transplantation for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Thabut, G., Christie, J. D., Ravaud, P., Castier, Y., Dauriat, G., Jebrak, G., Fournier, M., Lesèche, G., Porcher, R., & Mal, H. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-11-200912010-00004 · Cited by 172
Survival differences following lung transplantation among US transplant centers
Thabut, G., Christie, J. D., Kremers, W. K., Fournier, M., & Halpern, S. D. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.885 · Cited by 148
Leung, W. K., Ho, H. J., Lin, J.-T., Wu, M.-S., & Wu, C.-Y. (2018) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.013 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Grambsch, P. M., Therneau, T. M., & Fleming, T. R.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1469
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051526869
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic Plots to Reveal Functional Form for Covariates in Multiplicative Intensity Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2533277
- The paper
- Grambsch, P. M., Therneau, T. M., & Fleming, T. R. (1995). Diagnostic Plots to Reveal Functional Form for Covariates in Multiplicative Intensity Models. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.