The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of Experiments with Adaptive Interim Analyses
Abstract
A general method for statistical testing in experiments with an adaptive interim analysis is proposed. The method is based on the observed error probabilities from the disjoint subsamples before and after the interim analysis. Formally, an intersection of individual null hypotheses is tested by combining the two p-values into a global test statistic. Stopping rules for Fisher's product criterion in terms of critical limits for the p-value in the first subsample are introduced, including early stopping in the case of missing effects. The control of qualitative treatment-stage interactions is considered. A generalization to three stages is outlined. The loss of power when using the product criterion instead of the optimal classical test on the whole sample is calculated for the test of the mean of a normal distribution, depending on increasing proportions of the first subsample in relation to the total sample size. An upper bound on the loss of power due to early stopping is derived. A general example is presented and rules for assessing the sample size in the second stage of the trial are given. The problems of interpretation and precautions to be taken for applications are discussed. Finally, the sources of bias for estimation in such designs are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis
Brunkhorst, F. M., Engel, C., Bloos, F., Meier-Hellmann, A., Ragaller, M., Weiler, N., Moerer, O., Gruendling, M., Oppert, M., Grond, S., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa070716 · Cited by 2,921
Stahl, M., Stuschke, M., Lehmann, N., Meyer, H.-J., Walz, M. K., Seeber, S., Klump, B., Budach, W., Teichmann, R., Schmitt, M., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.00.034 · Cited by 1,314
Bretz, F., Hothorn, T., & Westfall, P. (2016) · doi:10.1201/9781420010909 · Cited by 1,233
Jakobsen, J. C., Wetterslev, J., Winkel, P., Lange, T., & Gluud, C. (2014) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-120 · Cited by 704
Performing high‐powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses
Lakens, D. (2014) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2023 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Bauer, P., & Kohne, K.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1029
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2331139255
- Cited by
- 865
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Experiments with Adaptive Interim Analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2533441
- The paper
- Bauer, P., & Kohne, K. (1994). Evaluation of Experiments with Adaptive Interim Analyses. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533441
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.