Cited by 1,233Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsData Analysis with RStatistical Methods and Applications

Multiple Comparisons Using R

Bretz, Frank, Hothorn, Torsten, Westfall, Peter·2016·Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks

Abstract

Adopting a unifying theme based on maximum statistics, Multiple Comparisons Using R describes the common underlying theory of multiple comparison procedures through numerous examples. It also presents a detailed description of available software implementations in R. The R packages and source code for the analyses are available at https://CRAN.R-pro

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1201/9781420010909

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After Bonferroni correction, only the projections of areas 7A and DP to area 10 were inconsistent despite a statistically very low probability of being so.

    “After applying the Bonferroni correction for evaluating multiple probabilities (Bretz et al. 2010), only the projections of areas 7A and DP to area 10 were inconsistent despite a statistically very low probability of being so.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bretz, F., Hothorn, T., & Westfall, P.
Affiliations
Texas Tech University (US)
Venue
Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks
Published
2016-04-19
OpenAlex
W396053900
Cited by
1,233
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 146 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 49
FWCI
12.36
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Thammasat University Digital Collections (submittedVersion)
  • TU Digital Collections (Thammasat University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Analysis with R
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
multiple comparisons, R software, statistical software implementation, hypothesis testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review