The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Note On "A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility"
Abstract
Lin (1989, Biometrics 45, 255-268) objected to the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient as a way to evaluate the reproducibility of measurements between two trials of an assay or instrunent and developed an alternative called the concordance correlation coefficient. It is noted that intraclass correlation refers not to a single coefficient but to a group of coefficients and that Lin's alternative is nearly identical to a subset of the coefficients in this group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Cited by
Within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis
Reuter, M., Schmansky, N. J., Rosas, H. D., & Fischl, B. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.084 · Cited by 2,356
Adieu features? End-to-end speech emotion recognition using a deep convolutional recurrent network
Trigeorgis, G., Ringeval, F., Brueckner, R., Marchi, E., Nicolaou, M. A., Schuller, B., & Zafeiriou, S. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2016.7472669 · Cited by 904
End-to-End Multimodal Emotion Recognition using Deep Neural Networks
Tzirakis, P., Trigeorgis, G., Nicolaou, M. A., Schuller, B., & Zafeiriou, S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.08619 · Cited by 752
Next-Generation Stool DNA Test Accurately Detects Colorectal Cancer and Large Adenomas
Ahlquist, D. A., Zou, H., Domanico, M., Mahoney, D. W., Yab, T. C., Taylor, W. R., Butz, M. L., Thibodeau, S. N., Rabeneck, L., Paszat, L. F., et al. (2012) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2011.10.031 · Cited by 315
Brown‐Schmidt, S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1080/03640210802066816 · Cited by 231
Metadata
- Authors
- Nickerson, C. A. E.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1503
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2318465276
- Cited by
- 510
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Note On "A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility". https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2533516
- The paper
- Nickerson, C. A. E. (1997). A Note On "A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility". Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533516
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
