The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Weedy West: Mobile Nature, Boundaries, and Common Space in the Montana Landscape
Abstract
The movement of weeds across human boundaries, and collective responses to that movement, created a common geographic space in which people adjusted parceled land to the exigencies of transboundary ecology. Examining the weed commons in Montana illuminates a shift in the 1930s toward the cooperative management of rural western landscape.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
European fences, Travelling Stock Routes (TSRs) and wells altered the vegetation and hydrological zones by placing barriers, creating voids, and altering the internal connections.
“European fences, Travelling Stock Routes (TSRs) and wells altered the vegetation and hydrological zones by placing barriers, creating voids, and altering the internal connections (Bates 2013; Benson 1991; Fiege 2005).”
From Exploratory GIS: modelling past land use and occupancy with functional connectivity, willandra lakes region world heritage area, NSW, australia (2022) · cites this paper as Fiege 2005
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thomas, K. (2022) · Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology · doi:10.5334/jcaa.98 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Fiege, M.
- Venue
- The Western Historical Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-04-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22
- ISSN
- 0043-3810
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
