Cited by 40Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and ManagementEmployee Performance and Motivation

Pay Factors as Predictors to Satisfaction: A Comparison of Reinforcement, Equity, and Expectancy.

Klein, S. M.·1973·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

A comparison of pay variables suggested by reinforcement, expectancy, and equity theories as predictors to a measure of global satisfaction is presented. Equity and expectancy variables provided pr...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/254693

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Klein, S. M.
Affiliations
Cleveland State University (US)
Corresponding author
Klein, S. M.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
1973-12-01
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
598-610
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2086475374
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Motivation
Keywords
pay factors, job satisfaction, reinforcement theory, equity theory, expectancy theory, compensation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review