Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 743

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Economies of Density versus Economies of Scale: Why Trunk and Local Service Airline Costs Differ

Caves, Douglas W., Christensen, Laurits R., Tretheway, Michael W.·1984·The RAND Journal of Economics

Abstract

There has been a perception that U.S. trunk airlines had an inherent cost advantage over smaller regional airlines because of economies of scale. We have formulated a general model of airline costs, which we estimate by using panel data on large and small airlines. Differences in scale are shown to have no role in explaining higher costs for small airlines. The primary factor explaining cost differences is density of traffic within an airline's network. Also of major importance is the average length of individual flights.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2555519

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 743

Metadata

Authors
Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Tretheway, M. W.
Venue
The RAND Journal of Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
471
ISSN
0741-6261 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143114661
Cited by
743
References
0
FWCI
11.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Economies of Density versus Economies of Scale: Why Trunk and Local Service Airline Costs Differ. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2555519
The paper
Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., & Tretheway, M. W. (1984). Economies of Density versus Economies of Scale: Why Trunk and Local Service Airline Costs Differ. The RAND Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555519

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.