The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Efficiency of Incomplete Contracts: An Empirical Analysis of Air Force Engine Procurement
Abstract
This article examines the incentives of contractual parties to design agreements that are left intentionally incomplete with regard to future duties or contingencies. More complete contracts mitigate ex post opportunism and the associated distortions in unobservable investment, but at the cost of additional resources expended in ex ante design. The optimal degree of contractual incompleteness involves a tradeoff between these opposing forces, the magnitudes of which may be predicted based on observable characteristics of the transactors and of the exchange environment. The resulting hypotheses are tested using panel data on the pricing procedures using in Air Force engine procurement contracts. We conclude that the degree of contractual completeness chosen in practice reflects a desire by the parties to minimize the economic costs associated with contractual exchange.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Contractual Solutions to the Hold-Up Problem
Rogerson, W. P. (1992) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297997 · Cited by 356
Cited by
Empirical Research in Transaction Cost Economics: A Review and Assessment
(1995) · The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036875 · Cited by 987
The Two Facets of Collaboration: Cooperation and Coordination in Strategic Alliances
Gulati, R., Wohlgezogen, F., & Zhelyazkov, P. (2012) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2012.691646 · Cited by 768
Auctions Versus Negotiations in Procurement: An Empirical Analysis
Bajari, P., McMillan, R., & Tadelis, S. (2009) · Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/jleo/ewn002 · Cited by 444
Trust and Adaptation in Relational Contracting
Jeffries, F. L., & Reed, R. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3707747 · Cited by 416
Contracts in Offshore Software Development: An Empirical Analysis
Gopal, A., Sivaramakrishnan, K., Krishnan, M. S., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.12.1671.25120 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Crocker, K. J., & Reynolds, K. J.
- Venue
- The RAND Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 126
- ISSN
- 0741-6261 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044648126
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Efficiency of Incomplete Contracts: An Empirical Analysis of Air Force Engine Procurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2555956
- The paper
- Crocker, K. J., & Reynolds, K. J. (1993). The Efficiency of Incomplete Contracts: An Empirical Analysis of Air Force Engine Procurement. The RAND Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555956
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.