The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation.
Abstract
This paper examines the role of administrators and technical employees in the process leading to innovation adoption. A marked division of labor is found. The evidence indicates that two distinct i...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators
Damanpour, F. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256406 · Cited by 6,542
Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.49388995 · Cited by 1,557
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00498.x · Cited by 1,296
INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA
DE VRIES, H., BEKKERS, V., & TUMMERS, L. (2016) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12209 · Cited by 1,214
Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study1
Chau, P. Y. K., & Tam, K. Y. (1997) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249740 · Cited by 1,067
Metadata
- Authors
- Daft, R. L.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1978-06-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-210
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2009980182
- Cited by
- 1,297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/255754
- The paper
- Daft, R. L. (1978). A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/255754
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
