The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation.
Abstract
This paper examines the role of administrators and technical employees in the process leading to innovation adoption. A marked division of labor is found. The evidence indicates that two distinct i...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators
Damanpour, F. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256406 · Cited by 6,542
Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.49388995 · Cited by 1,557
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00498.x · Cited by 1,296
INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA
DE VRIES, H., BEKKERS, V., & TUMMERS, L. (2016) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12209 · Cited by 1,214
Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study1
Chau, P. Y. K., & Tam, K. Y. (1997) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249740 · Cited by 1,067
Managerial Influence in the Implementation of New Technology
Leonard-Barton, D., & Deschamps, I. (1988) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.10.1252 · Cited by 812
An Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer‐based Interorganizational Systems*
Grover, V. (1993) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1993.tb01295.x · Cited by 757
Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization
Zmud, R. W. (1982) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.28.12.1421 · Cited by 597
Assessing a Multidimensional Measure of Radical Technological Innovation
Green, S. G., Gavin, M. B., & Aiman-Smith, L. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/17.403738 · Cited by 457
A guide to knowledge translation theory
Estabrooks, C. A., Thompson, D. S., Lovely, J. J. E., & Hofmeyer, A. (2006) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.48 · Cited by 435
Schryen, G. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.45 · Cited by 420
Al-Husseini, S., El Beltagi, I., & Moizer, J. (2021) · International Journal of Leadership in Education · doi:10.1080/13603124.2019.1588381 · Cited by 296
Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: adoption of imaging technology
Nystrom, P. C., Ramamurthy, K., & Wilson, A. L. (2002) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/s0923-4748(02)00019-x · Cited by 263
Shin, H., Lee, J.-N., Kim, D., & Rhim, H. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.015 · Cited by 199
Modelling the innovation process: An empirical comparison of approaches
King, N. (1992) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1992.tb00487.x · Cited by 193
Innovation Modification during Intraorganizational Adoption
Lewis, L. K., & Seibold, D. R. (1993) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258762 · Cited by 193
Organizing public sector AI adoption: Navigating between separation and integration
Selten, F., & Klievink, B. (2024) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101885 · Cited by 147
Chen, Y., Bretschneider, S., Stritch, J. M., Darnall, N., & Hsueh, L. (2022) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1874497 · Cited by 66
Memory-based change management: Using the past to guide the future
Do, B., & Lyle, M. C. B. (2022) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/20413866221093512 · Cited by 7
Malik, M. Y., & Awan, A. W. (2016) · Business and Economic Research · doi:10.5296/ber.v6i2.10140 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Daft, R. L.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1978-06-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-210
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2009980182
- Cited by
- 1,297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
