The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CORPORATE RISK-RETURN RELATIONS: RETURNS VARIABILITY VERSUS DOWNSIDE RISK.
Abstract
This study tested a model of firm risk-return relations in which risk was conceptualized in terms of downside outcomes. Drawing on the behavioral theory of the firm, we developed a set of hypothese...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725153 · Cited by 7,297
Cited by
Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159562 · Cited by 1,717
Drnevich, P. L., & Kriauciunas, A. P. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.882 · Cited by 681
Is sibling rivalry good or bad for high technology organizations?
Khoja, F. (2008) · The Journal of High Technology Management Research · doi:10.1016/j.hitech.2008.06.006 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, K. D., & Leiblein, M. J.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1996-02-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-122
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2326814585
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 41.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
